Full case report
Harrods Ltd v Dow Jones & Co Inc
Reference  EWHC 1162 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Eady J
Date of Judgment 22 May 2003
Defamation – libel – jurisdiction – whether the claimant could sue the defendant in this jurisidiction
The Claimant sued over an article entitled “The Enron of Britain” published in the Wall Street Journal (U.S. edition). There were less than 20 publishees in the jurisdiction.
Application for a stay on forum grounds by the Defendant and application to serve out of the jurisdiction by the Claimant.
The stay on forum grounds was refused and permission was granted to serve out of the jurisdiction. There were publications within the jurisdiction and they were arguably tortious. There was no “single publication rule” and therefore that could not be relied upon. Since damage was presumed in a defamation action the fact that there was no evidence of actual damage to reputation would not prevent a claim being brought.
Whilst this case merely applies well known legal principles it does establish a useful precedent for claimants seeking to sue within the jurisdiction where the “substance” of the publication took place elsewhere and publication within the jurisdiction was minimal. But minimal circulation in this jurisdiction will not always guarantee success on jurisdiction: in this case, a US judge had stated that the US was not the appropriate forum for the action.
Kendall Freeman for the Claimant
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.