Cases

Fallon v Horseracing Regulatory Authority

Held

(1) The refusal to consider the evidence was correct. To consider that evidence, and thereby to attempt to second guess the CPS, was not a valid exercise. Consideration of only parts of the evidence in relation to only parts of the Crown's case would have given no true indication of the strength or weakness of the case as a whole.

(2) No error of law or principle was found in the decision to suspend. The decision was neither capricious nor obviously wrong and was within the ambit of the discretion of the HRA.

Also