Cases

McKeown v British Horseracing Authority

Issue

(1) Had the tribunals erred in law in aggregating separate non-probative pieces of evidence in relation to the charges of non trying?

(2) Were the tribunals’ findings that M had supplied inside information relating to horses knowing that the information would be used to place lay bets perverse?

(3) Were the decisions of the Panel and/or Appeal Board vitiated by actual or apparent bias?

Also