Full case report
Beckham & Another v News Group Newspapers Ltd
Reference  EWHC 2252 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Gray J
Date of Judgment 20 Oct 2005
Libel – Specific Disclosure – CPR Part 31.12 – Correct Test to be Applied
Both parties made applications for specific disclosure: the Defendant for specific disclosure of 8 categories of documents from the Claimants; and the Claimants for disclosure of interviews that the Defendant’s journalists had conducted with the Claimants’ former nanny, Abbie Gibson. The action, which is for libel, related to an article published in The News of the World in September 2004 which the Claimants contended meant, in broad terms, that for financial reasons they were cynically and hypocritically trying to convince the public that their failed marriage was perfect. The Defendant asserted that documents in each category they were seeking must exist and should be disclosed. The Claimants asserted that the Defendant had failed to meet the relevant test and that, in some instances, there were no documents or those that did exist were protected by legal professional privilege. The Defendant opposed the Claimants’ application on the basis that disclosure was not relevant.
(1) Whether the Claimants should be ordered to provide specific disclosure of the 8 categories of documents to the Defendant.
(2) Whether the Defendant should be ordered to provide specific disclosure of the tape recordings of its interviews with Ms Gibson.
(1) The Judge first referred to CPR Part 31.6 and Part 31.8. The power of the court to make an order for specific disclosure will only be exercised in “an appropriate case”. The power to direct disclosure of documents leading to a train of enquiry which may enable the applying party to advance his own case or damage that of the party giving disclosure arises only where an order has been made for a search for documents. Disclosure will be ordered only when necessary for the fair disposal of the action.
(2) In all but two categories of documents the Defendant’s application was dismissed, as it did not pass the test set out in (1) above. In the remaining two categories, the judge ordered that undertakings offered by the Claimants to make further enquiries to ascertain whether any documents existed should be accepted by the Defendant.
(3) The Defendant was ordered to provide specific disclosure as it related to an issue on the pleadings and the journalists’ credibility.
Applications for specific disclosure need to be focussed. Disclosure will be ordered to the extent only that it is necessary for the fair disposal of the action. In addition, the disclosure sought must be proportionate to the relevance and importance of the issues to which the documents are said to be relevant.
Harbottle & Lewis for the Claimants; Farrer & Co for the Defendant
Beckhams deny putting on a face - Sky News
Beckhams go to court in defence of their marriage - Daily Mail
Beckhams take on NoW over marriage claims - The Guardian
Beckhams to face libel jury over claims their marriage is a sham - Daily Telegraph
Beckhams to hear libel case tapes - BBC News
Huge damages 'unlikely' in Beckhams' libel case - Press Gazette
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.