Full case report
Kinch v Associated Newspapers Ltd
Reference  EWHC 1020 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Eady J
Date of Judgment 29 Apr 2002
Defamation – Libel – meaning – justification – allegation of infamy – bad reputation
The Claimant complained of the allegation, amongst others, that he was infamous which was published in the Defendant’s newspaper. The Defendant sought to justify that allegation by reference to a series of press cuttings to show that, justly or unjustly, the Claimant had acquired a bad reputation.
Whether reliance on the press cuttings was permissible.
If the allegation of infamy is, in context, defamatory, then reliance on press cuttings is impermissible because the mere fact of bad publicity will not make reasonable persons think worse of another. The facts which show, or give reasonable grounds for believing, the person has behaved discreditably, must be pleaded.
An allegation that a Claimant has a bad reputation is not necessarily defamatory so cannot be justifiied merely by pleadinga Claimant’s bad press.
Actons (Leicester) for the Claimant; Stock Fraser Cukier for the Defendant
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.