Full case report
Ronaldo v Mirror Group Newsapers Ltd; Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
Reference  EWHC 2862 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Sharp J
Date of Judgment 14 Oct 2009
Defamation – Libel – Pre-Trial Review – Whether two actions for libel should be heard at the same time or separately
The Claimant, a very well-known professional footballer, brought actions for libel against the publishers of The Mirror and The Telegraph. At a CMC an order was made that there should be a hearing of both claims where the Judge could give directions whether the claims should be tried together or consecutively.
Whether the two trials should be tried together or separately
The trials should be heard separately and the Telegraph trial should follow the Mirror action. There were significant differences between the two actions in relation to meaning and justification and whilst extra costs would be incurred if the actions were tried separately it could be unjust to the Telegraph if the jury’s view of meaning in the Telegraph action was affected by the view that it took of the Mirror action.
The Mirror action settled in November 2009 with an apology and payment of damages. The Telegraph trial is due to take place in May 2010.
Schillings for the Claimant; David Price for the Telegraph; Davenport Lyons for the Mirror
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.