Full case report

Times Newspapers Ltd v Burstein

Reference [2002] EWCA Civ 1739
Court Court of Appeal

Judge Lord Phillips MR, Mance & Latham LJJ

Date of Judgment 28 Nov 2002


Summary

Defamation – Libel – Costs – Conditional Fee Agreement – Indemnity principle – Preliminary issue – Order for cross-examination


Facts

Times Newspapers (D) had been the unsuccessful defendant to a libel action brought by Keith Burstein (C). Shortly before the trial C, who was of admittedly modest financial means, entered into a CFA with his solicitors. At the assessment of C’s costs, D sought to argue by way of preliminary issue in the assessment that the indemnity principle had been breached, that any agreement between C and his solicitors that he would be liable for their fees was a sham, and that the CFA was invalid and unenforceable. The Deputy Costs Judge dismissed D’s application for a full hearing including for cross-examination of C and his solicitors. D appealed. The appeal was remitted to the Court of Appeal.


Issue

Whether D was entitled to pursue the issue further, in particular by means of the cross-examination sought.


Held

Dismissing D’s appeal, the Costs Judge had been undoubtedly right to conclude that there was no basis for challenging the evidence put before the Court by C’s solicitors to the effect that there had been no breach of the indemnity principle.


Comment

The case is an early example of the many that have made their way up to the Court of Appeal in recent years in which paying parties have sought to challenge an impecunious receiving party’s entitlement to costs. Latham LJ’s closing remarks speak for themselves: ‘Satellite litigation about costs has become a growth industry, and one that is a blot on the civil justice system. Costs Judges should be astute to prevent such proceedings from being protracted by allegations that are without substance.’


Instructing Solicitors

Times Legal Dept for the Appellant; David Price & Co for the Respondent


Links

Judgment