Filter cases by:
Barrister
- Desmond Browne CBE KC
- Justin Rushbrooke KC
- Adrienne Page KC
- Andrew Caldecott KC
- Tom Blackburn SC
- Alexandra Marzec
- David Sherborne
- Jonathan Barnes KC
- Godwin Busuttil
- Adam Wolanski KC
- William Bennett KC
- Christina Michalos KC
- Jacob Dean
- Adam Speker KC
- Richard Munden
- David Hirst
- Victoria Simon-Shore
- Victoria Jolliffe
- Felicity McMahon
- Chloe Strong
- Gervase de Wilde
- Julian Santos
- Greg Callus
- John Stables
- Ben Hamer
- Patrick Milmo KC
- Professor Tony Smith
- Patrick McCafferty QC
Johnson v Eastlight Community Homes
Data Protection – Misuse of Private Information – Breach of Confidence – Negligence – Jameel – De Minimis – Allocation
JQL v NTP
Privacy - breach of confidence - social media - real and substantial tort - general damages - aggravated damages - injunctive relief
Jonathan Coulter v Independent Press Standards Organisation CIC
IPSO – Judicial Review – Jurisdiction – Third Party Complaints – Accuracy –Irrationality
JPH v XYZ (No 2)
Privacy - injunction - revenge porn - anonymity - Article 8 ECHR - Article 10 ECHR - unless order - debarring order
JPH v XYZ (No 1)
Privacy - without notice injunction - "revenge porn" - disclosure order - service by email
JX MX v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
Open justice – anonymity orders – children – infant settlements – personal injury - CPR r21.10 - Article 8 – Article 14 - reporting the courts
Jose Antonio Serrano Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited
Libel- Defamation- Trial- Justification- Honest comment- Damages- Aggravated damages
JC v Central Criminal Court
Orders under section 39 Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - expiry on 18th birthday - protection of defendants and witnesses
Johnston v League Publications Ltd
Defamation- Preliminary Ruling- Meaning- Innuendo
Jerrard v Blyth & Ors
Defamation - Setting aside - Claim form not served - Proceedings in limbo - Costs - Indemnity basis
Jackson v Universal Music Operations Ltd
Libel - Malicious falsehood - Responsibility for publication - Internet - YouTube - Defamatory meaning - Statement that copyright claim made
JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd (CA)
Injunction - Anonymity order - Privacy - Misuse of private information - Open justice - Article 8 ECHR - Article 10 ECHR - Reporting restrictions
Jan Cambridge v Guillermo Makin
Libel - trial - judge alone - justification - qualified privilege - malice - joint tortfeasors - damages
JIH v News Group Newspapers (No 2)
Injunction - Anonymity order - Privacy - Misuse of private information - Open justice - Articles 8, 10 ECHR
JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd
Injunction - Anonymity order - Privacy - Misuse of private information - Open justice - Article 8 ECHR - Article 10 ECHR – Consent orders
Joseph & others v Spiller & another
Defamation - Fair comment - s.6 Defamation Act 1952 - Public interest - Words capable of being comment - Justification - Breach of contract - Employment Agencies & Employment Business Regulations 2003
Johnson v MGN Ltd
Libel - Meaning - Innuendo - CPR 53, PD 4.1 - Whether words capable of bearing pleaded defamatory meanings
John v Guardian News & Media Ltd
Defamation – Libel – Meaning – Ruling on meaning – Whether words capable of bearing contended meaning – Comment
Jeynes v News Magazines Limited & Anor
Libel – Defamatory meaning - Whether words complained of capable of bearing pleaded meaning
Jules Rimet Cup Ltd v The Football Association Ltd
Trade marks - Applications - Application for trade marks in 'bad faith' - Relevance of legal advice in determining 'bad faith'
Passing off - Goodwill - Subsistence of goodwill in absence of commercial activity
Copyright - Artistic works - Duration - Exploitation of artistic work by industrial process - S.52, Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 - Infringement - Substantial part
Jones v Associated Newspapers Limited
Libel - Costs - Claimant's Part 36 offer - CPR 36.14 - CFAs
Jane Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation & Others
Privacy - Breach of confidence - Rape victim - Identification - Breach of reporting restriction - Breach of statutory duty - Negligence - Measure of damages - Aggravated damages - Exemplary damages
Johnson v Medical Defence Union (No.2) (CA)
Data protection - Personal data - Selection of information from manual and electronic files - Whether “processing” of data - Whether processing unfair - Damages - Causation - Quantum - Damage to reputation - ss 1(1), 13, Sch 1, Pts 1, II, Data Protection Act 1998
Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (No.2) (HL)
Defamation - Libel – Reynolds qualified privilege - Presumption of damage - Corporate claimants
John v Associated Newspapers Ltd
Privacy - Article 8, ECHR - Breach of confidence - Injunction - Photographs - Photograph of Claimant in public street
Johnson v Medical Defence Union Ltd (No 2)
s.13 Data protection Act 1998 - compensation - processing of personal data - fairness and compliance with data protection principles
Jockey Club v Keightley & others
Disciplinary proceedings - betting ring - heavy betting that horse would lose - phone records showing links between gamblers and trainer - innocent explanation of calls put forward - breaches of Rules of Racing - penalty
Johnson v Perot Systems Europe Ltd & Another
Defamation - Breach of contract - Negligent misstatement - Summary Judgment - CPR Part 24 - Abuse of process - Fraud and dishonesty - Judicial impartiality - Justification - Qualified privilege
Jockey Club v Carter & Others
Disciplinary proceedings - jockey - betting ring - heavy betting that jockey's ride would lose - phone records showing links between gamblers and jockey - breaches of Rules of Racing - penalty
Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
Defamation - Libel - Statutory qualified privilege - Justification - Grounds to inquire - Case management - Striking out
Jockey Club v Carphone Warehouse Ltd
Sports Law- Jockey Club investigation – third party disclosure – Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction – Article 8
Jockey Club v Matthew Batchelor
Sports Law - Disciplinary Tribunal - Breach of the Orders and Rules of Racing - Rule 220(viii) - Deliberately misleading Jockey Club investigating officers - Financial penalty
Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (No.2) (CA)
Defamation - Libel – Reynolds privilege – Relevance of Bonnick v Morris - Presumption of damage – Presumption of falsity
Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co. Inc.
Defamation - libel – Internet publication - presumption of damage - identification of Claimant – no real and substantial tort/abuse of process
Johnson v Medical Defence Union Ltd
Data Protection - Subject Access request - s.7 Data Protection Act - Disclosure - CPR Part 31
Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Meaning of words complained of - Chase 'level 2' and 'level 3 meanings' - Pleadings - Whether article capable of being defamatory of corporate claimant
Jennings v Buchanan
Defamation - Libel - Absolute privilege - Parliamentary privilege - Whether statement made out of Parliament enjoying absolute or qualified privilege - Whether necessary to plead precise words used - Appeal from New Zealand Court of Appeal
Jockey Club v Rodgers
Sports Law- Tribunal- Breach of the Orders and Rules of Racing - Rule 247 - Owner laying own horse to lose - Disqualification.
Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe
Defamation - Libel - Qualified Privilege - Reynolds defence
Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (CA)
Libel - meaning - preliminary ruling as to capable meanings - qualified privilege - admissibility of evidence bearing on truth of allegation complained of
Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd
Defamation - Libel - Meaning of words complained of - Whether article capable of being defamatory of corporate claimant - Justification - Summary judgment
Johnson v Home Office
Breach of Confidence - Damage to Reputation - Public Interest Defence - Negligence - Proximity - Foreseeability - Remoteness of Damage -Trial
Jockey Club v Bradley
Sports Law- Tribunal- Appeal- Human rights - Article 6 ECHR- independence and impartiality
Jockey Club v Buffham
Confidential information - breach of confidence - final injunction against defendant - third party applying to use documents confidential to the claimant obtained from defendant - whether use of such documents by third party a contempt of court
Jones v Pollard
Defamation - Libel - Quantum of damages - whether award was excessive