Full case report
Bamgboye v Reed & Others
Reference  EWHC 2922 (QB);  EMLR 61
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Hazel Williamson QC
Date of Judgment 28 Nov 2002
Copyright – Ownership – Musical work – Joint authorship
The Claimant and the Defendants worked together in creating and recording a number of musical tracks that were commecially released. The Claimant contended that the original musical work “Bouncing Flow” was a joint creation between himself and the Defendants. The Defendants denied that he made any material contribution to the work and that he had any rights in the sound recording.
Whether the Claimant had any interest in the musical work “Bouncing Flow”.
The Claimant had made a 50% contribution to the drum track of “Bouncing Flow”, and his overall contribution was one third and the First Defendant’s two thirds. Accordingly, the Claimant was one third owner of the copyright in “Bouncing Flow”.
A useful authority for its consideration of the meaning of ‘joint authorship’. Ray v Classic FM Plc  F.S.R. 622; and Hadley v Kemp  EMLR 589 were applied.
Magrath & Co for the Claimant; the Defendants in person.
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.