Full case report
London Regional Transport v Mayor of London
Reference  EWCA Civ 1491;  EMLR 88
Court Court of Appeal
Judge Aldous, Robert Walker & Sedley LJJ
Date of Judgment 24 Aug 2001
Breach of confidence – Contract – Injunction – public interest- Human Rights
The claimants appealed the decision of Sullivan J. to discharge an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing a redacted report critical of the proposed public-private-partnership (PPP) for London’s underground.
Whether a breach of confidence was involved in the publication of the report in its redacted form and whether the public interest justified publication in spite of an express provision as to confidentiality in the employment contract of the individual leaking the report.
(1) The report was credible and criticised a fundamental element of the proposed PPP and, as such, was of immense public interest. (2) The court was not of the opinion that further redaction was required to preserve commercial confidentiality.
Some previous authorities suggested that once a party had contractually agreed to keep something confidential there was little room for any public interest argument based on freedom of expression – see e.g. AG v Barker  3 All ER 257. The LRT case makes it clear that contractual rights, whilst important, are not determinative, particularly at the interim stage.
LRT Solicitor for the Claimant; Baker McKenzie for the Defendant
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.