Full case report
Mills v News Group Newspapers Ltd
Reference  EMLR 957
Court Chancery Division
Judge Lawrence Collins J
Date of Judgment 4 Jun 2001
Injunction – Privacy – Confidence – Press Complaints Commission Code of Conduct – European Convention on Human Rights – Article 10 – Article 8 – s.12 Human Rights Act 1998
Anxious that the address of her new property might become public knowledge, and in fear of her physical safety following disturbing emails, the Claimant, Heather Mills, by then publicly associated with Sir Paul McCartney, applied to have an injunction maintained against The Sun’s threatened disclosure of the information.
Whether the private address of a famous person will be protected as confidential information.
The mere publication of an address is not confidential information or, of itself, an unwarranted invasion of privacy. The freedom to impart the information outweighed Mills’ article 8 rights. The risk to her was slight. It was well known she lived in the town: pictures of her former home has been published in national newspapers previously. The avowal of The Sun that it would not publish was taken into account.
A prohibition on the publication of an individual’s address is only likely if he or she can demonstrate a real danger to them(as per Venables & Thompson).
Sheridans for the Claimant; Farrer & Co for the Defendant
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.