Full case report
Bennett & Another v BBC & Another
Reference  EWHC 553 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Gray J
Date of Judgment 20 Mar 2003
Defamation – libel – particulars of justification – whether the defendant could justify the common sting of the whole article when the Claimant only complained about parts of it
The BBC published an article on its website criticising the Claimant’s plan to launch an amateur manned rocket into space. The project was described as suicidal.
Could the Defendant justify the common sting of the whole article even though the Claimant only complained about parts of it.
The article was not simply a collection of disparate criticisms of the Claimant; it was a comprehensive critique of the whole of his project therefore all of the article, the disparate stings as well as the general sting, could be justified.
An example of how difficult it can be for claimants to avoid the problem of the defendant being able to justify parts of an article about which he does not complain.
Cobbetts for the Claimant; BBC Litigation Department for the Defendants
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.