Full case report
P & Others v Quigley
Reference  EWHC 1051 (QB)
Court Queen's Bench Division
Judge Eady J
Date of Judgment 16 May 2008
Misuse of private information – False information – Article 8 – Article 10 – Injunctive relief – Breach of contract
An application for a permanent privacy injunction by a former director and chief executive of a corporate claimant (which advanced a claim in contract). An interim injunction had been granted in November 2007. D had resigned from the company in 1999, following an internal investigation suggesting he had diverted business in breach of contract. Criminal proceedings against D were abandoned. A malicious falsehood claim brought by D against R was settled. In November 2007 D threatened to publish a fictitious internet ‘novella’ featuring P & Q, thinly disguised, partaking in unsavoury sexual conduct.
Whether a permanent injunction was justified in the circumstances
Granting the injunction in favour of P & Q but adjourning the argument in relation to R, the corporate claimant;
(1) There was no conceivable public interest in making scurrilous allegations against P & Q, transparently or indirectly.
(2) There was no realistic prospect of any defence succeeding.
(3) D had not confirmed he would not publish the allegations as threatened.
An example of a privacy injunction involving false information in which there was nothing at all to be put in the Defendant’s scales for the ‘ultimate balancing act.’
Eversheds for the Claimants; Defendant in person
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.