Full case report
A & others v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others
Reference  EWHC 2444 (Fam);  1 All ER 587;  1 FLR 689
Court Family Division
Judge Sumner J
Date of Judgment 27 Nov 2002
Reporting Restrictions – Family – Children – Applications by Media to vary/discharge order – Costs
The press applicants sought to report parts of a hearing concerning a dispute within 2 families about whether their children should have the MMR vaccine. The application was unsuccessful and all the families sought their costs against the press applicants.
Whether it was appropriate to make an order for costs.
Given a previous provisional order that parts of the trial should be heard in public the press should not be penalised in costs for making an application to that effect.
Despite the fact that successful press applicants are rarely awarded the costs of lifting unjustified reporting restrictions (see Ex parte News Group Newspapers Ltd  EMLR 160 the court made it clear that there was a considerable costs risk to the press in intervening at the eleventh hour.
More from 5RB
5RB is the pre-eminent set in the area for handling defamation, privacy, contempt and data protection matters. Interviewees praise the set for having great depth and quality of counsel, and note that it boasts many of the top barristers in the field. Get the lowdown here.
New 22nd Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, published by Sweet & Maxwell. Further info here.