Filter cases by:
Barrister
- Desmond Browne CBE KC
- Justin Rushbrooke KC
- Adrienne Page KC
- Andrew Caldecott KC
- Tom Blackburn SC
- Alexandra Marzec
- David Sherborne
- Jonathan Barnes KC
- Godwin Busuttil
- Adam Wolanski KC
- William Bennett KC
- Christina Michalos KC
- Jacob Dean
- Adam Speker KC
- Richard Munden
- David Hirst
- Victoria Simon-Shore
- Victoria Jolliffe
- Felicity McMahon
- Chloe Strong
- Gervase de Wilde
- Julian Santos
- Greg Callus
- John Stables
- Ben Hamer
- Patrick Milmo KC
- Professor Tony Smith
- Patrick McCafferty QC
Tinkler v Ferguson & others
Malicious Falsehood – Abuse of Process – Section 3 Defamation Act 1952
Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors
Malicious Falsehood – Strike Out – Abuse of Process – Damage – Jameel abuse
Thompson v James
Defamation - Libel- Appeal - Meaning - Whether Blog post bore meaning found by Judge - Whether Rules on Meaning needed to be amended for political speech- Article 10
The Lord McAlpine of West Green v Sally Bercow
Defamation - Meaning – Natural and Ordinary Meaning – Innuendo – Repetition Rule - Social Media
Thompson v James and Carmarthenshire County Council
Libel – justification – honest comment – qualified privilege – malice - public authorities – Article 8 HRA – Derbyshire v Times Newspapers – Part 20 claim - damages
Tamiz v Google Inc
Defamation - liability of ISPs - Publisher - Defamation Act 1996 - Google Inc
Tilbrook v Parr
Tilbrook- Parr- defamation- malicious falsehood- whether words capable of referring to Claimant- strike out –summary judgment
Tilbrook v Parr
Defamation - Reference
Terluk v Berezovsky (No.2)
Defamation -appeal- damages- meaning- liability for republication- privilege- justification – fresh evidence - jury trial
Tesla Motors Ltd v BBC
Malicious Falsehood - Particulars of Claim - Particulars of Damage - Defamation Act 1952 s. 3
Thornton v Telegraph Group (No. 4)
Defamation - Malicious Falsehood - offer of amends - malice - knowledge - Defamation Act 1996
Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (No 3)
Defamation – Malicious falsehood – Amendment – Application to amend defence to malicious falsehood claim to plead honest comment – Whether amendment should be permitted
Terluk v Berezovsky (CA)
Defamation - Adjournment – Refusal of adjournment – Delay – Legal representation – Fair trial – Litigant in person - Right to jury trial - Waiver
Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (No 2)
Defamation – Libel – Summary judgment - Determination of meaning – Whether words capable of bearing defamatory meaning – Threshold of seriousness
Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
Defamation – Libel - Fair comment – Striking out - Words capable of being comment – Facts not truly stated by reviewer - s.6 Defamation Act 1952
Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v The United Kingdom
Freedom of expression - Article 10 ECHR - Libel - Internet publication - Archives - Qualified privilege - Reynolds privilege - Freedom of expression - Article 10 ECHR - Single publication rule - Internet publication rule
Tycon Energy Corp v The Motley Fool Limited
Defamation - Libel - Internet postings - Norwich Pharmacal order - Anonymous representations by posters - Costs
Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc
Libel - Meaning - Innuendo - Whether words capable of bearing defamatory meanings
Tesco Stores Ltd v Guardian News & Media Ltd and Rusbridger
Defamation – Libel – Malicious falsehood - Offer of amends – Stay – Burstein plea - Amendments
Trumm v Norman
Defamation - Libel – Qualified privilege – Meaning – Damages –Assessment of damages
Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2) (Costs)
Defamation - Libel - Appeal - Costs capping orders - Conditional Fee Agreements - Level of costs cap - Expenditure within a costs cap - Recoverability of a QC's fees
Turkot & Global GOLD Holding v Oxus Gold & Trew
Libel - Trial of preliminary issues - Whether suitable for trial by judge alone - s.69(4) Supreme Court Act - Whether appropriate to order in the claim
Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd (CA)
Defamation - Libel - Offer of amends - Assessment of compensation under s.3(5) Defamation Act 1996 - Burstein plea - 'Directly relevant background context' - Mitigation of damages
Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd
Defamation - Libel - Cost-capping orders - Conditional Fee Agreements - After-the-event insurance policies - CPR Rule 3.1 - CPR Part 26 Practice Direction
Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Another
Defamation - Libel - Offer of Amends - Assessment of Compensation under <A
href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/legis/num_act/da199699/s3.html"
target=_blank>s.3(5) Defamation Act 1996 - 'Burstein' plea - Whether mitigation or aggravation
Turcu v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
Libel - Justification - Video evidence - Privilege against self-incrimination - CFAs
Turcu v News Group Newspapers Ltd
Defamation - abuse of process - lack of evidence from Claimant - CFA agreements - inference of desire for vindication - summary judgment - mode of trial
Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel Four Television Corpn & Another
Confidential Information - Defamation - Injunction - Secret Footage - Employee- Duty of Confidentiality - Breach of Contract
Tanner v Filby and Howell
Defamation - Justification - Fair comment - Issue estoppel - Abuse of process - Fair Trial - Freedom of Expression - Human rights - Article 6 - Article 10 - European Convention on Human Rights
Times Newspapers Ltd v Burstein
Defamation - Libel - Costs - Conditional Fee Agreement - Indemnity principle - Preliminary issue - Order for cross-examination
Tolstoy Miloslavsky v United Kingdom
Defamation - Libel - Freedom of expression - article 10- access to court - artcile 6- quantum of libel damages - injunction restraining further publication - security for costs order