Background
5RB - Leading barristers' chambers specialising in all areas of Media & Communications Law

Ronaldo v Mirror Group Newsapers Ltd; Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd

Reference:
[2009] EWHC 2862 (QB)
Court:
Queen's Bench Division
Judge:
Sharp J
Date of Judgment:
14/10/2009
Summary:

Defamation – Libel – Pre-Trial Review – Whether two actions for libel should be heard at the same time or separately

Appearances:
Adam Speker KC (Claimant)
Instructing Solicitors:
Schillings for the Claimant; David Price for the Telegraph; Davenport Lyons for the Mirror

The Claimant, a very well-known professional footballer, brought actions for libel against the publishers of The Mirror and The Telegraph. At a CMC an order was made that there should be a hearing of both claims where the Judge could give directions whether the claims should be tried together or consecutively.

Whether the two trials should be tried together or separately

The trials should be heard separately and the Telegraph trial should follow the Mirror action. There were significant differences between the two actions in relation to meaning and justification and whilst extra costs would be incurred if the actions were tried separately it could be unjust to the Telegraph if the jury’s view of meaning in the Telegraph action was affected by the view that it took of the Mirror action.

The Mirror action settled in November 2009 with an apology and payment of damages. The Telegraph trial is due to take place in May 2010.


Related People

Adam Speker KC

Call 1999 Silk 2020

Adam Speker KC

Resources

Search Resources

Related expertise

Register for 5RB updates

Click below to sign up for updates

Register

Portfolio Builder

Select the our work that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)