Background
5RB - Leading barristers' chambers specialising in all areas of Media & Communications Law

Kinch v Associated Newspapers Ltd

Reference:
[2002] EWHC 1020 (QB)
Court:
Queen's Bench Division
Judge:
Eady J
Date of Judgment:
29/04/2002
Summary:

Defamation – Libel – meaning – justification – allegation of infamy – bad reputation

Appearances:
Jacob Dean KC - Leading Counsel (Defendant)
Kinch v Associated Newspapers Ltd - Leading Counsel (Claimant)
Kinch v Associated Newspapers Ltd (Claimant)
Instructing Solicitors:
Actons (Leicester) for the Claimant; Stock Fraser Cukier for the Defendant

The Claimant complained of the allegation, amongst others, that he was infamous which was published in the Defendant’s newspaper. The Defendant sought to justify that allegation by reference to a series of press cuttings to show that, justly or unjustly, the Claimant had acquired a bad reputation.

Whether reliance on the press cuttings was permissible.

If the allegation of infamy is, in context, defamatory, then reliance on press cuttings is impermissible because the mere fact of bad publicity will not make reasonable persons think worse of another. The facts which show, or give reasonable grounds for believing, the person has behaved discreditably, must be pleaded.

An allegation that a Claimant has a bad reputation is not necessarily defamatory so cannot be justifiied merely by pleadinga Claimant’s bad press.


Related People

Jacob Dean KC

Call 1995 Silk 2025

Jacob Dean KC

Resources

Search Resources

Related expertise

Register for 5RB updates

Click below to sign up for updates

Register

Portfolio Builder

Select the our work that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)