Jonathan Scherbel-Ball - 5RB Barristers

Jonathan is recognised as a leading junior practising in all aspects of media, communications and information law.

In 2020, Jonathan was appointed as a member of the Attorney General’s ‘B’ Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. Jonathan is also called to the Bar of Northern Ireland. In 2022, Jonathan was appointed to the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives, an independent body which advised the Secretary of State for DCMS on issues relating to access to public records and representing the public interest in deciding what records should be open or closed.

Recent cases of interest include:

R (Newsquest Media Group Limited) v Legally Qualified Chair of Police Misconduct Tribunal [2022] EWHC 299 (Admin) for local newspaper publisher Newsquest in its judicial review claim concerning open justice principles in police misconduct hearings.
Miller & Power v Turner [2021] EWHC 2135 (QB) – Junior Counsel for the Defendant in a libel and harassment claim about publications on twitter.
Timis and anr v BBC and anr [2021] – Junior Counsel for the BBC in a claim for libel and breach of confidence. The Claimants sought damages of more than US$450m arising out of a BBC Panorama investigation into the acquisition of oil and gas concessions in Senegal.
MacAirt v JPI Media NI Ltd and others [2021] NIQB 52 – Junior Counsel for the Belfast Newsletter in its successful strike out of claims for privacy and libel.
R (Finch) v Surrey County Council [2021] EWHC 170 (QB), Junior Counsel for the BBC in a contempt application arising out of a live-streamed remote hearing.
Burleigh v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2020] EWHC 2359 (QB), Junior Counsel for the Defendant in a trial on meaning of an apology to the US First Lady.
M v CAFCASS (2019, unreported) Counsel for CAFCASS in a case about the interaction of data protection law with adoption rules.
Cooper v National Crime Agency [2019] EWCA Civ 16, Junior Counsel for the NCA in a leading case on data sharing in an employment context.
Allen v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 1235 (QB), Counsel for the Times in a trial on meaning.
Appleby Global LLC v BBC and anr [2018] EMLR 14 – Junior Counsel for the BBC in the ‘Paradise Papers’ data leak litigation.
in Townsend v Google Inc [2017] NIQB 81, Junior Counsel for Google in the first right to be forgotten case to be determined substantively by a UK Court.

Cases

Defamation and Privacy

Miller & Power v Turner [2021] EWHC 2135 (QB)

MacAirt v JPI Media NI Ltd and others [2021] NIQB 52

Timis and anr v BBC and anr [2021]

Burleigh v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2020] EWHC 2359 (QB)

Allen v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 1235 (QB)

Al-Haddad v BBC (unreported, 2017-2018)

KRW Law LLP and others v News Group Newspapers (2017-2018) unreported

Declan Arthurs v News Group Newspapers [2017] NICA 70

Townsend v Google Inc [2017] NIQB 81

Cushnahan v BBC and anr [2017] NIQB 30.

KL & NN v Sunday Newspapers Ltd [2015] NIQB 88

Scappaticci v BBC (unreported 2015)

Slocombe v Ricochet Ltd and Channel 5 (unreported 2015)

Loughran v Century Newspapers [2014] NICA 26

Way v Northcliffe Media Ltd (unreported, 2012)

Neil Morrissey v Associated Newspapers Ltd (unreported, 2011)

Taranissi v BBC [2008] EWHC 2486 (QB)

Haddock v MGN and others [2008] NICh 14

Data Protection and Information Law

ABC v Google LLC [2019] EWHC 3020 (QB)

M v CAFCASS (2019, unreported)

Ministry of Defence v Information Commissioner [2019] UKFTT 2018/0147

Cooper v National Crime Agency [2019] EWCA Civ 16

Adedeji v Information Commissioner and Department of Health [2018] UKFTT 2017/0110

Cooper v National Crime Agency (2017, unreported)

Hazelwood v ICO & Cabinet Office [2017] UKFTT 2016/0204

Galloway v Frazer, Google Inc and others [2016] NIQB 7

Singh Khosa v Secretary of State for Justice (2016, unreported)

Hegglin v Persons Unknown and Google Inc [2014] EWHC 3793 (QB); [2015] 1 Costs L.O. 65

Miller v ICO and BBC [2014] UKFTT 2013/0253

Newbery v Information Commissioner and BBC [2012] UKFTT 2009/0118

Montford v Information Commissioner and BBC [2012] UKFTT 2009/0114

Reporting Restrictions and Reporting the Courts

Jonathan has appeared on behalf of the media at many high profile criminal trials seeking to challenge or vary reporting restrictions. These include R v Hill (2019, the Shoreham air disaster), R v Pryce (allegations of perverting the course of justice), and R v Hayes (LIBOR-rigging allegations).

In addition he has appeared in the following cases on reporting restrictions

R (Newsquest Media Group Limited) v Legally Qualified Chair of Police Misconduct Tribunal [2022] EWHC 299 (Admin)

Ahmed v BBC (2019) unreported

Hunt v Hunt [2012] All ER (D) 217 (Oct)

R v Premier News Ltd and anr (2012, unreported)

Publications and Seminars

Contributor to Arlidge, Eady and Smith on Contempt, 5th Edition, 2017.

Criminality and Privacy: Uneasy Bedfellows, New Frontiers in Media and Information Law, June 2007.

Media Access to Court Documents: Transparency in the Family Court, Family Law Bar Association Annual Conference, 2014.

Perception and Reality: Publicity Developments in the Family Courts, Family Law Bar Association, December 2013.

Contributing Editor of Survey of English Libel Law, Media Law Resource Center, 2011-2015.

Contributing researcher on comparative defamation analysis for Article 19, the Global Campaign for Free Expression, 2006-07.

The Business of Keeping Secrets, Commercial Litigation Journal, 2007.

Called

2010 Called to the Bar of England and Wales
2013 Called to the Bar of Northern Ireland

Education

University of Oxford (Lincoln College) MA (Hons) Modern History and Politics - 2000-2003
Postgraduate Diploma in Law (Oxford Brookes) - 2004
Legal Practice Course, Oxford Institute of Legal Practice - 2005
University of Cambridge (Fitzwilliam College) MPhil Modern European History - 2010

Areas of work

Defamation and Malicious Falsehood
Data Protection and Information Law
Privacy and Confidence
Reporting the Courts and Contempt
Pre-publication Advice
Human Rights
Injunctive Relief
Media regulation

Testimonials

Chambers and Partners 2020 Defamation/Privacy say that Jonathan is “Unbelievably intelligent, incredibly devoted to his work and has very good judgement. A pleasure to work with.”

Chambers and Partners 2020 Data Protection say that Jonathan is “Passionate and absolutely dedicated: he’ll work tirelessly until the job is done.” “Very hard-working and very energetic, he always brings something new.”

Chambers and Partners 2019 say that Jonathan “has an excellent knowledge of all aspects of defamation, data protection and privacy law.” Defamation/Privacy)

“He always goes the extra mile, and is all over the case like a dog with a bone. Nothing is ever a problem for him, and he tackles issues head-on.” (Data Protection)

Legal 500, 2018 describe Jonathan as “Absolutely meticulous in his analysis and work.”

Chambers and Partners 2018 quote Jonathan’s referees as saying that “He’s extremely responsive and able to add value in a short span of time”. “A truffle hound for data protection issues, he produces excellent work product and is very hard-working.” (Data Protection)

“He is extremely user-friendly, very sharp, and always up to speed on the most recent case law.” (Defamation/Privacy)

Legal 500, 2017 says that Jonathan is “deeply knowledgeable, perceptive, productive and responsive.”

Chambers and Partners 2017 describe Jonathan as “genuinely engaged, committed and hugely diligent. The energy that he brings to a case is absolutely phenomenal. A great team player, his ability to come up with pretty much every available legal argument for assessment is incredibly impressive.” (Data Protection)

“He has a genuinely encyclopaedic knowledge of this area of law.” “He’s fantastic – incredibly responsive, really sharp and not afraid to give a frank view, which is refreshing.” (Defamation/Privacy)