Cases
- Solicitor General v Yaxley-Lennon [2024] EWHC 2732 (KB), [2025] EWCA Civ 476
- Wei & Ors v Long & Ors [2025] EWHC 158 (KB)
- Iqbal v Geo TV Limited
- (1) Joseph Pacini, (2) Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc [2024] EWHC 2714 (KB)
- Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc & Ors
- Vince v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Ryland v Channel Four Television Corporation [2024] UKFTT 603
- Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Alexander Greensill
- Harcombe v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Mueen-Uddin v SSHD
- George v Cannell
- Various Claimants v NGN (TPI)
- Clifford v Millicom Services UK Ltd & Ors
- WFZ v British Broadcasting Corporation
- Blake and ors v Fox
- Bermuda Press (Holdings) Limited v Tamine
- Baroness Lawrence & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Cooper v Evans & anor
- Blake & ors v Fox (CA)
- Green v (1) Hannah-Wood & (2) Rouse
- Wright v McCormack (CA)
- Davidoff & Ors v Hargrave
- McGee v Lewis
- Chishti v Spottiswoode & Ors
- R (Alexander) v Secretary of State for Justice
- Amersi v Leslie and another
- Lownie v FCDO
- Armstrong Watson LLP v Person(s) Unknown
- Muhammad v Daily The News International
- R (MNL) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court
- Clifford v Millicom Services UK Ltd
- Stoute v News Group Newspapers Limited
- Soriano v Le Point & Anor
- Pendragon Plc v Person(s) Unknown
- Hinduja v Hinduja
- Smith v Backhouse
- Sir James Dyson & Ors v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor
- Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney
- Guardian News & Media v The Executor of HRH Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh (deceased) & Her Majesty’s Attorney-General
- George v Cannell (CA)
- Soriano v Le Point & Anor
- (1) Dr Fatima Jabbar (2) DRJ55 Limited v AVIVA Insurance UK and others (No 1)
- (1) Kumlin (2) EEW Eco Energy World plc v (1) Jonsson (2) Agerman (3) Östlund (4) Realtid Media AB
- Millicom Services UK Limited & Ors v Michael Clifford
- BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor Inc
- Raffaele Mincione v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A
- Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney
- (1) Dr Fatima Jabbar (2) DRJ55 Limited v AVIVA Insurance UK and others (No 2)
- The Ince Group plc v Person(s) Unknown
- Guardian News & Media v (1) Rozanov; (2) EFG Private Bank Ltd
- Attorney General v BBC
- ZXC v Bloomberg LP
- Vardy v Rooney
- Stadler v Currys Group Ltd
- R (on the application of Newsquest Media Group Ltd) v Legally Qualified Chair of the Police Misconduct Tribunal
- Blake, Seymour & Thorp v Fox
- Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors
- Mahmudov & Mahmudova v Goni Sanzberro & ors
- Abdulrazaq v Hassan & Ors
- Johnson v Eastlight Community Homes
- Wright v McCormack
- Rolfe v Veale Wasbrough Vizards LLP
- Farhan Junejo v New Vision TV Limited
- Ashley v Times Newspapers Limited
- Cilliers v Gibraltar Health Authority
- Blackledge v Persons Unknown
- Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism
- Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney
- Hodges v Naish
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
- Canary Riverside Estate Management Ltd & Ors v Coates
- (1) Allen (2) Wood v (1) Panorama Limited (2) Olivero
- Corbyn v Millett
- Soriano v Silverstein
- Lady Colin Campbell v MGN Ltd
- Sahota v Middlesex Broadcasting Corporation Ltd & Ors
- Parris v Ajayi & Ors
- Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Tinkler v Ferguson & others
- (1) Williams (2) Wickham-Jones (3) Lownie v (1) IC (2) FCDO
- Wright v Granath (CA)
- Soriano v Forensic News & ors
- True Vision Productions Ltd v Information Commissioner
- Gerrard & Anor v (1) ENRC Ltd (2) Diligence International LLC
- Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v GEDI Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A & Anor
- Wan-Bissaka & Anor v Bentley
- Greenstein v Campaign against Antisemitism
- Depp v News Group Newspapers
- Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou v (1) Telegraph Media Group (2) Mr Ben Marlow
- Aven & Ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd
- Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors
- Serafin v Malkiewicz & Others
- JQL v NTP
- Fortescue Metals Group & anor v (1) Argus Media Ltd (2) S&P Global Inc
- CWD v Nevitt & Ors
- ZXC v Bloomberg LP
- (1) Greensill Capital (UK) Limited (2) Alexander Greensill v Reuters News And Media Limited
- Sube v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Express Newspapers (No 3)
- Hunter v Cooper & ors
- BVG v LAR (No 2)
- WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents)
- R (Autonomous Non-Profit Organisation TV-Novosti) v The Office of Communications
- Re Al M (Reporting Restrictions Order)
- Dimitri Rozanov v EFG Private Bank Limited
- DSM SFG Group Holdings Limited v Kelly
- Anna Turley v Unite the Union and Stephen Walker
- Triplark Limited v Northwood Hall (Freehold) Ltd & others
- UKIP Ltd v Braine & Ors
- Kirkegaard v Smith
- UUU v BBB
- Chandler v O’Connor
- EuroEco Fuels (Poland) Ltd & Ors v Szczecin and Swinoujscie Seaports Authority SA & Ors
- Sheikh v Associated Newspapers Limited
- R (BBC) v Newcastle Crown Court
- Sadik v Sadik
- SOJ v JAO
- Lloyd v Google LLC
- AAA v Rakoff
- BVC v EWF (No. 2)
- (1) GC (2) AF (3) BH (4) ED v CNIL
- Google v CNIL
- BVG v LAR (No 1)
- Caine v Advertiser & Times Ltd and Ors (No. 2)
- Simon v Lyder
- Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV
- R (oao TT) v The Registrar General for England and Wales
- Choudhrie v Choudhrie
- A & B v X & Y and Times Newspapers Ltd
- Solicitor General v Holmes
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
- Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Alsaifi v Secretary of State for Education
- Serafin v Malkiewicz
- Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland
- XW v XH (Court of Appeal)
- RJ v Tigipko 2
- Greenstein v Campaign against Antisemitism
- Richard Burgon MP v News Group Newspapers Limited and Thomas Newton Dunn
- Linklaters LLP & Linklaters Business Services v Mellish
- RJ v Tigipko
- Cooper v National Crime Agency
- BBC v Independent Office for Police Conduct
- Nugent v Willers
- Carruthers v Associated Newspapers Limited, Carruthers v News Group Newspapers Limited
- Wafic Rida Saïd v (1) Groupe L’Express (2) Guillaume Dubois
- Zahir Monir v Steve Wood
- Poulter v Times Newspapers Limited
- Kenny v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs & Another
- Morgan v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Swift v Information Commissioner & Highways England
- Various Claimants v Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC
- BVC v EWF
- Hemsworth (formerly ‘SWS’) v Department for Work and Pensions
- Workspace Commerce Ltd & ors v Filis
- Sube v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Express Newspapers (No 2)
- Reay v Beamont
- Lownie v (1) The Information Commissioner (2) National Archives (3) FCO
- DB v General Medical Council
- Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- (1) TLU (2) TLV v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Home Office
- Ministry of Justice v Ellis
- Sabados v Facebook Ireland
- Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH
- In the Matter of G (A Child) (transparency)
- R (on the application of Drain) v Birmingham Crown Court and others
- Sube v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Express Newspapers
- Douglas v News Group Newspapers
- Jonathan Coulter v Independent Press Standards Organisation CIC
- PML v Person(s) Unknown
- (1) NT1 & (2) NT2 v Google LLC
- NPV v QEL & ZED
- R (on the application of Emblin) v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
- Galloway v Ali-Khan
- AXB v BXA
- Clarkson Plc v Person or Persons Unknown
- Shakil Khan (formerly JMO) v Tanweer Khan (formerly KTA)
- Stocker v Stocker
- Al-Ko Kober Ltd & Anor v Balvinder Sambhi (contempt)
- Appleby Global Group LLC v (1) British Broadcasting Corporation and (2) Guardian News and Media Limited
- Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland
- Appleby Global Group LLC v (1) British Broadcasting Corporation and (2) Guardian News and Media Limited
- Clarkson Plc v Person or Persons Unknown
- LJY v Persons Unknown
- HRH Prince Louis of Luxembourg v HRH Princess Tessy of Luxembourg & anor
- Various Claimants v WM Morrisons Supermarket PLC
- Brown v Bower & Another
- Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v R & Anor
- Bukovsky v CPS (CA)
- Al-KO Kober Ltd & Anor v Balvinder Sambhi
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd (Serious harm)
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd (Privilege)
- Chang Wa Shan v Esther Chan Pui Kwan
- Townsend v Google Inc. and Google UK Limited
- Keith Singh v Joseph Weayou
- Mionis v Democratic Press SA and others
- Howell v South London Church Fund and Southwark Diocesan Board of Finance
- Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Ministry of Defence v Information Commissioner & Evans
- Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Limited & another
- Malaga-Cano v Barclay & ors
- Blue v Ashley v Times Newspapers Limited
- Nick Brown v (1) Tom Bower & (2) Faber & Faber Limited
- Markham and Anor v R
- R v Jemma Beale
- Sir Cliff Richard OBE v (1) The British Broadcasting Corporation (2) Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Ahmed v (1) Express Newspapers (2) Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Stunt v Associated Newspapers
- Mohamed Ali Harrath v (1) Stand for Peace Limited & (2) Samuel Westrop
- Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd, Maiya Keidan & Persons Unknown
- Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor
- Yalland & Ors v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
- Bains, Kazan-Allen & VNP v Moore, K2 Intelligence Ltd & Bigazzi
- Basuta v Dhemrait
- Norman v Norman
- Barron v Collins
- Flymenow Limited v Quick Air Jet Charter GmbH
- Wade & Perry v British Sky Broadcasting Limited
- ERY v Associated Newspapers Limited
- (1) Khaled Undre (2) Down to Earth (London) Ltd v London Borough of Harrow (No.2)
- Begg v BBC
- R ((1) Ingenious Media Holdings plc and (2) Mr Patrick McKenna) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Alcott v Ashworth (No. 2)
- (1) Pippa Middleton (2) James Matthews v Persons Unknown
- AQA v Newsquest & ors
- C (A Child)
- Richardson v (1) Trinity Mirror (Merseyside) Ltd (2) Neil Docking
- Alexander Economou v David de Freitas
- Simpson v Mirror Group Newspapers Limited (CA)
- Cartier International AG v BSkyB (CA)
- TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Alexander Economou v David de Freitas (PTR)
- PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (SC)
- Sarah Lynette Webb v Lewis Silkin LLP
- (1) Khalid Undre, (2) Down to Earth London Ltd v London Borough of Harrow
- V v Associated Newspapers Ltd and Others
- PJS v News Group Newspapers (2)
- Home Office v Information Commissioner & Yeo
- Axon v Ministry of Defence
- Mohamed Ali Harrath v (1) Stand for Peace Ltd (2) Samuel Westrop
- Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub
- Anglia Research Ltd v Finders Genealogists Ltd
- Hiranandani-Vandrevala v Times Newspapers Limited
- Svetlana Lokhova v Piotr Tymula
- Abdel-Bari v Nottingham University NHS Trust
- Alvaro Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA
- PJS v News Group Newspapers
- Niall Horan v Express Newspapers
- Mir Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Limited & Fayaz Ghafoor
- Her Majesty’s Attorney General v The Conde Nast Publications Ltd
- Weston v Bates & Leeds United Football Club
- Richardson v Facebook; Richardson v Google (UK) Ltd
- Brand & Goldsmith v Berki
- JPH v XYZ (No 2)
- KL and NN v Sunday Newspapers Limited
- Pinard-Byrne v Linton
- JPH v XYZ (No 1)
- Appleton v Gallagher
- Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd, Evening Standard Ltd, AOL (UK) Ltd
- Cheshire West and Chester Council v Pickthall
- Sloutsker v Romanova
- National Farmers’ Union v Tiernan
- His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publishing Limited
- In the matter of an application by JR38 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
- Rhodes (previously “MLA”) v OPO
- Associated Newspapers v Murray
- Rada-Ortiz v Espinosa-Vadillo
- Lachaux v AOL UK
- Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (CA)
- R (Evans) v HM Attorney General (Supreme Court)
- YXB v TNO
- Rufus v Elliott (preliminary issue)
- Cruddas v Calvert (CA)
- Levi v Bates (CA)
- Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
- Kololo v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Sloutsker v Romanova
- Rufus v Elliott (CA)
- Traveller Movement v Ofcom & Channel 4
- CG v Facebook Ireland Ltd
- JX MX v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
- Kerner v (1) WX and (2) YZ
- Ames & anor v The Spamhaus Project Ltd & anor
- Sebry v (1) Companies House and (2) The Registrar of Companies
- Home Office v Information Commissioner & Cobain
- Wilson v Ferguson
- Mosley v Google Inc
- Al Hamadani v Al Khafaf and others
- QRS v Beach (No. 3)
- Mionis v Democratic Press SA
- HRH Prince Al-Waleed v Forbes
- Mahmood v BBC
- Braun v Poland
- R v William Cornick
- Bewry v Reed Elsevier UK Ltd (CA)
- R v NCJ Media Ltd; R v Aitken
- McIntosh -v- (1) Information Commissioner (2) BBC
- Donovan v Gibbons
- Coulson v Wilby
- Stankiewicz v Poland
- OPO (a child by BHM his litigation friend) v MLA
- Jose Antonio Serrano Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited
- QRS v Beach
- Ampito Ltd v Pask
- Merlin Entertainments LPC and others v Peter Cave
- QRS v Beach (No. 2)
- Brand v Berki
- Yeo MP v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Cooke v MGN Ltd
- PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Hegglin v Persons Unknown
- Crawford v Jenkins
- Building Register Ltd v Weston
- Cartus Corporation v Siddell
- SRJ v Persons Unknown
- Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v France
- Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd
- Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Heesom v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales
- Thompson v James
- Google Spain SL v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
- AVB v TDD
- Rapisarda v Colladon
- Mughal v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- (1) Contostavlos (2) Simpson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- L.H. v Latvia
- Weller v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Meadows Care v Lambert
- Ashworth v Royal National Theatre
- Murray v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Uppal v Endemol UK Ltd
- JC v Central Criminal Court
- Kennedy v Charity Commission
- Johnston v League Publications Ltd
- White v Express Newspapers (Costs)
- White v Express Newspapers (Meaning)
- McEvoy v Michael
- R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- R (Evans) v Attorney General
- Jerrard v Blyth & Ors
- Surrey County Council v ME
- Makudi v Baron Triesman of Tottenham
- Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB
- Jackson v Universal Music Operations Ltd
- RBOS Shareholders Action Group Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Pentikainen v. Finland
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Reynolds v Bovey
- Vidal-Hall v Google Inc
- Lillo-Stenberg v Norway
- Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.3)
- Fox v Boulter (disclosure)
- P (A Child)
- Marine A v Guardian News and Media
- Ungvary v Hungary
- Mitchell MP v News Group Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Krause v Newsquest Media Group Ltd
- Rufus v Elliott
- Briggs v Jordan
- PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Shozab Abbas v Nawa-I-Jang (17 October 2013)
- Karpov v Browder
- Subotic v Knezevic
- Delfi AS v Estonia
- von Hannover v Germany (No. 3)
- Cruddas v Calvert & Others (No.4)
- Robyn Rihanna Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (T/A Topshop)
- Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Ministry of Justice v Information Commissioner
- Surrey County Council v Al-Hilli and the Chief Constable of Surrey
- Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 5)
- Cruddas v Calvert & Others (No.3)
- Cruddas v Calvert & Others (No.2) (CA)
- AVB v TDD
- Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Co v Al Refai
- Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd
- Cruddas v Calvert & Others (No.2)
- Fox v Boulter
- The Lord McAlpine of West Green v Sally Bercow
- AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Cruddas v Calvert
- Smith v Dha
- Thompson v James and Carmarthenshire County Council
- Waterson v Lloyd
- McCann v Bennett
- Smeaton v Equifax Plc
- Tamiz v Google Inc
- Al Amoudi v Kifle
- Cruddas v Adams
- Graiseley Properties Ltd v Barclays Bank Plc
- R (T) v Greater Manchester Chief Constable (CA)
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd (Costs) (CA)
- Ambrosiadou v Coward
- KC v MGN Ltd (Costs)
- RocknRoll v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Hussein & Ors v Hamilton Franks & Co Ltd & Anr
- Bristol City Council v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Cammish v Hughes (CA)
- Price v Powell
- Andrew James Enforcement Ltd v ITV PLC
- Mengi v Hermitage (No 2)
- Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd
- Abbey v Gilligan
- Ansari v Knowles
- Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins
- Cairns v Modi; KC v MGN Ltd
- Qadir v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Michael Wilson & Partners v Sinclair
- Evans v Information Commissioner & 7 Government Departments
- McClaren v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- C v Holland
- R (UK2 Telecom Limited) v Sir Hayden Phillips, Independent Reviewer of ASA Adjudications
- Montford v Information Commissioner and BBC
- Mengi v Hermitage (security for costs appeal)
- Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Crow v Johnson
- Tilbrook v Parr
- Tilbrook v Parr
- Handsworth Football Club v Football Assocation
- El Naschie v Macmillan Publishers Ltd
- King v Sunday Newspapers Ltd
- Brescla Calcio SpA v West Ham United FC Plc
- MXB v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
- WXY v Gewanter
- Levi v Bates
- Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police
- Majeed & Westfield v R
- Mark Lewis v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Trimingham v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd (costs)
- King v Grundon
- Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
- CVB v MGN Ltd
- Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios
- Tony D Sullivan (aka Rudey Solomon) v Bristol Film Studios Ltd
- Qema v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Cammish v Hughes
- Foley & Others v Lord Ashcroft
- R (On the application of Guardian News and Media) v (1) City of Westminster Magistrates Court (2) Government of the United States
- Contostavlos v Mendahun
- BUQ v HRE
- Church v MGN Limited
- Cairns v Modi No 2
- Flood v Times Newspapers Limited (SC)
- Weston v Bates
- KC v MGN
- Giggs (previously known as CTB) v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Gold v Cox (No.2)
- Spelman v Express Newspapers (No. 2)
- Viagogo Ltd v (1) Paul Myles (2) Hardcash Productions (3) Channel Four Corporation
- Gold v Cox (No.1)
- Spelman v Express Newspapers (No.1)
- Cambridge v Makin
- von Hannover v Germany (No. 2)
- Axel Springer AG v Germany
- Phillips v (1) News Group Newspapers Ltd (2) Glenn Mulcaire; Coogan v (1) News Group Newspapers Ltd (2) Glenn Mulcaire
- Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd
- R (Associated Newspapers Ltd) v Rt Hon Sir Brian Leveson (as Chairman of the Leveson Inquiry)
- Dell’Olio v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Morrison v Buckinghamshire County Council
- Zinda v ARK Academies
- Dominic Raab MP v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Terluk v Berezovsky (No.2)
- Waterson v Lloyd (No 2)
- Cooper v Turrell
- Waterson v Lloyd
- McKeown v Attheraces Ltd (No 2)
- STU v UVW
- CTB v News Group Newspapers
- Davison v Habeeb & Ors
- (1) Ting Lan Hong (2) Child KLM v XYZ & Ors
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Limited (No 2)
- Tesla Motors Ltd v BBC
- eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez and Robert Martinez v MGN Limited
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor v Times Newspapers Ltd & Anor
- Kordowski v Hudson
- Crookes v Newton
- Sleeman v Panchaud
- Adelson v Anderson
- Ferdinand v MGN Ltd
- Al-Amoudi v Kifle
- Attorney-General v (1) MGN Limited (2) News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Farid El Diwany v Ministry of Justice
- Modi & IMG v Clarke
- Lait v Evening Standard Ltd (CA)
- Wright v Caan
- Thornton v Telegraph Group (No. 4)
- Hutcheson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- A Local Authority v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Ashcroft v Foley (No 2)
- R (Bonhoeffer) v GMC
- Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Cook v Telegraph Media Group Limited (No 3)
- Goodwin v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- Araci v Fallon
- Modi v Clarke; IMG v Clarke
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Morgan v A Local Authority (Re X, Y and Z)
- Mosley v UK
- Bacon v Automattic Inc
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- OPQ v BJM
- K v News Group Newspapers Ltd (also known as ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd)
- H and L v A City Council (CA)
- Ambrosiadou v Coward (CA)
- Awdry Bailey and Douglas v Kordowski
- White v Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Lewis v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Bowker v RSPB
- Baturina v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Goldsmith & Anor v BCD; Khan v BCD
- RJA v AJR
- A (A Child) v Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- A (A Child) v Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Allen v The Grimsby Telegraph
- Clift v Clarke
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- Hunt v Evening Standard Ltd
- Ashcroft v Foley
- Re Baby RB (Press Injunction)
- Hirschfeld v McGrath
- Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors
- Brady v Norman (No 2) (CA)
- McKeown v Attheraces Ltd
- Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (No 3)
- JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Wallis v Meredith
- Re MGN Ltd
- Woodbridge v Stapleton
- MGN Ltd v UK
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Jan Cambridge v Guillermo Makin
- Clift v Slough Borough Council (CA)
- R (On the application of Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court
- CDE v MGN Ltd
- Lait v Evening Standard Ltd (No 2)
- ABC Ltd v Y
- Hayden & Anor v Charlton; Hayden & Anor v Carver
- XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- KGM v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Spiller v Joseph
- R (on the application of Secretary of State for the Home Department) v HM Coroner for Inner West London
- Terluk v Berezovsky (CA)
- Daniels v BBC
- KJH v HGF
- Lykiardopulo v Lykiardopulo
- JIH v News Group Newspapers (No 2)
- Donald v Ntuli
- Cairns v Modi
- Ernst & Young v Coomber
- Ifedha v Archant Regional Ltd
- Ezeugo v Hendon Magistrates Court
- JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth
- Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Limited
- Gray v UVW
- Saaristo v Finland
- AMM v HXW
- Driza v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
- Farrall v Kordowski
- BBC v HarperCollins Publishers Limited
- Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corporation
- Sanoma Uitgevers BV v Netherlands
- Islam Expo Ltd v The Spectator (1828) Ltd & Pollard
- Peacock v MGN Ltd (Costs)
- Paton v Poole BC
- Kaschke v Gray & Hilton (No 2)
- Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Henderson v The London Borough of Hackney & The Learning Trust
- Mariapori v Finland
- Fiddes v Channel Four Television Corporation & Ors (No 2) (CA)
- Khader v Aziz & Ors (CA)
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No 2)
- Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (No 2)
- R (on the application of Harper and Johncox) v Aldershot Magistrates Court
- Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd (No 2) (CA)
- Brady v Norman (No 2)
- Hays Plc v Hartley
- HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor
- Sanders v Percy & Ministry of Justice (No 2)
- Al Rawi v Security Service
- Mireskandari v Associated Newspapers Limited (No 3)
- Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd (No 2)
- Bowman v MGN Ltd
- TUV v Persons Unknown
- Fulham FC v West Ham United
- British Chiropractic Association v Singh (CA)
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Lait v Evening Standard Ltd
- Fiddes v Channel 4 Television Corporation & Ors (CA)
- Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier
- Bridle v Williams
- McKeown v British Horseracing Authority
- Berezovsky v Russian State Television & Another (No 2)
- A v B (EAT)
- Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)
- Mireskandari v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- Fedchenko v Russia (No 2)
- Kubaszewski v Poland
- Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown
- R v Sheppard & Whittle
- Re SC (Children) sub nom SC v HC
- Guardian News and Media Ltd & Ors in HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors
- In re Guardian News and Media Ltd
- Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v BBC
- The Higher Education Funding Council for England v The Information Commissioner & Guardian News and Media Ltd
- Gillan & Quinton v UK
- Re Ward; sub nom Dr A & Others v Ward & Ward
- Far Out Productions Inc v Water Music Productions Ltd & Ors
- Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor
- Financial Times Ltd & Ors v United Kingdom
- Imerman v Imerman
- Hughes v Risbridger & British Airways Plc
- R (on the application of A) v B
- BKM Ltd v BBC
- G & G v Wikimedia Foundation Inc
- Williams v MGN Ltd
- Karsai v Hungary
- North London Central Mosque Trust v Policy Exchange & Anor
- Lockton Companies International & Ors v (1) Persons Unknown (2) Google Inc
- DW v The Scottish Ministers
- Independent News and Media Ltd & Ors v A
- Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Lonzim Plc & others v Sprague
- Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Martin v Channel Four Television Corporation & Others
- Winslet v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- R (on the application of L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
- Karim v Newsquest Media Group
- White v Withers LLP & Ors (CA)
- Europapress Holding D.O.O v Croatia
- Hunt v AB
- Joseph & others v Spiller & another
- Chief Constable of Humberside v Information Commissioner & Another
- Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Department of Health v (1) Information Commissioner (2) Pro Life Alliance
- Ronaldo v Mirror Group Newsapers Ltd; Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Kahangi & Ors v Nourizadeh
- Bloom v Robinson-Millar
- RFS Capital LLC & RFS Capital BV v MD7 Europe & Michael Gianni
- Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd
- RST v UVW
- ASG v GSA
- Marathon Mutual Ltd & Anor v Waters & Anor
- McLaughlin & Ors v Newall
- Sanders v Percy & Ministry of Justice
- Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v (1) Designtechnica Corporation (2) Google UK Ltd & (3) Google Inc
- Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd (No 2)
- Attorney General v Random House Group Ltd
- Re Child X (Residence and Contact – Rights of media attendance – FPR Rule 10.28(4))
- Desmond v Bower (CA)
- Clift v Slough Borough Council & Kelleher
- Levi v Bates
- Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v Switzerland (No.2)
- Johnson v MGN Ltd
- Spencer v Spencer
- HMRC v Banerjee
- Bray v Deutsche Bank AG (No 2)
- Attorney-Generals Reference No. 3 of 1999 Application by the BBC to set aside or vary a Reporting Restriction Order
- The Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Guardian News & Media Ltd v Information Commissioner
- Webster & Ors v The Governors of the Ridgway Foundation School
- Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (CA)
- Napier & Another v Pressdram Ltd
- Re Stedman & Patten (& Others)
- Attorney General v Seckerson & Times Newspapers Ltd
- Monks v Warwick District Council
- Quinton v Peirce & Cooper
- Karako v Hungary
- Egeland v Norway
- Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd
- Peacock v MGN Ltd
- Sanoma Uitgevers BV v Netherlands
- Noorani v Calver (No 2 Costs)
- Barclays Bank PLC v Guardian News & Media Ltd
- Noorani v Calver (No 1)
- Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v The United Kingdom
- Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd (Third Party Disclosure)
- Radu v Houston & Another (No.4)
- Sugar v BBC & Anor (HL)
- Eerikäinen & Ors v Finland
- Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd
- Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl v UK (Admissibility)
- Haji-Ioannou v (1) Dixon (2) Regus Group PLC (3) Regan
- Wakefield v Ford & Anor
- WER v REW
- Bedeau v London Borough of Newham
- Reklos and Davourlis v Greece
- R (On the application of Taranissi) v HFEA
- F & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Mardas v New York Times; Mardas v International Herald Tribune
- John v Guardian News & Media Ltd
- Crossley & Crossley v Newsquest (Midlands South) Limited
- Tycon Energy Corp v The Motley Fool Limited
- Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc
- Armonienë v Lithuania
- Briscoe Mitchell v Hodder & Stoughton Ltd & Anr, Associated Newspapers Limited (non-party)
- Clarke t/a Elumina Iberica UK v Bain & Prolink Holdings Corp
- Mireskandari v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- White v Withers LLP & Dearle
- H v Tomlinson
- Hayter v Fahie
- Club La Costa (UK) PLC v (1) Toby Gebhard (2) Inventory Solutions (UK) Limited
- Hughes v Alan Dick & Co Ltd
- Hussein v Farooq & Sheik
- Brady v Norman
- Apsion v The Bar Standards Board
- Crossley & Anor v Wallace & Anor
- Gentoo Group Ltd (formerly Sunderland Housing Co Ltd) v Hanratty
- Berezovsky v Russian State Television & Another
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Guardian News & Media Ltd and Rusbridger
- Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors (No 2)
- Applause Store Productions Ltd & Firsht v Raphael
- Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- Ewing v News International & Ors
- Medway Council v G and Others
- I v Finland
- Warren v The Random House Group Ltd (Nos.1-3) (CA)
- Attorney General v ITV Central Ltd
- Radu v Houston & Another (No.3) (CA)
- Westcott v Westcott (CA)
- Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner (HL)
- Ministry of Defence v Griffin
- Liberty & Ors v UK
- Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- FA Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure & Ors
- Mond & Ors v Mason & Ors
- Malik v Manchester Crown Court & Anor
- Gravil v Caroll & Redruth RFC (CA)
- Meltex Ltd & Movsesyan v Armenia
- Kieren Fallon v MGN Limited (No 3)
- Patel v Allos Therapeutics Inc
- Bray v Deutsche Bank AG
- O2 Holdings Ltd & Anor v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd (ECJ)
- McPhail & Doyle v Bourne & Anor
- Hart v Stewart
- Alitha Publishing Ltd & Constantinides v Cyprus
- Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Atlantis World Group of Companies NV & Another v Gruppo Editoriale L’Espresso SpA
- P & Others v Quigley
- Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd (CA)
- Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Gur v Avrupa Newspaper Ltd & Anor (CA)
- Seray-Wurie v Charity Commission of England and Wales
- Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex
- Smith v ADVFN Plc (CA)
- Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No 1)
- Gentoo Group Ltd (formerly Sunderland Housing Co Ltd) v Hanratty
- Fisher v Brooker & Onward Music (CA)
- Walker v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (Costs)
- Kulis v Poland
- Sharma v Singh & Associated Newspapers (No. 2)
- R (Animal Defenders International) v Culture Secretary (HL)
- R v Westminster Mags Court & ASIC ex p Hafner & Ors
- Rath v Guardian News & Media Limited & Anor
- W v JH & A County Council Limited
- Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- Freer v Zeb & Ors
- Guja v Moldova
- Ivereigh v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Crawford v CPS
- Selvarajan v GMC
- R (Corner House Research & Another) v Director of Serious Fraud Office
- R v Croydon Crown Court & A & B ex parte Trinity Mirror plc & Ors
- Jeynes v News Magazines Limited & Anor
- Heart of Midlothian v Webster & Wigan Athletic FC
- Seaga v Harper
- Balan v Moldova
- Trumm v Norman
- Akinleye v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
- Astron Clinica Ltd & Ors v Comptroller General
- BBC v Sugar & The Information Commissioner (CA)
- Oxford University & Ors v Broughton & Ors
- R (on the application of British Board of Film Classification) v Video Appeals Committee
- Commissioner of Police of Bermuda & Anor v Bermuda Broadcasting Co Ltd & Ors
- R v Swansea Crown Court, ex parte BBC
- FA Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure & Ors
- Condé Nast Publications Ltd & Anor v UK
- Blackwell v Bates & Ors
- Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd
- Warren v The Random House Group Ltd (No.3)
- Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
- Malik v Newspost Ltd & Ors
- Sharma v Singh & Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Stoll v Switzerland
- R (Green) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court
- Warren v The Random House Group Ltd
- Warren v The Random House Group Ltd (No.2)
- Radu v Houston & Another (No.3)
- Voskuil v Netherlands
- Walker v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
- Northern Rock PLC v Financial Times Limited & Others
- Pfeifer v Austria
- Ghannouchi v Al Arabiya News Channel FZ-LLC
- Lepojic v Serbia
- Her Majesty’s Stationery Office & Ordnance Survey v Green Amps Ltd
- Assistant Deputy Coroner for Inner West London v Channel Four Television
- Chemodurov v Russia
- Westcott v Westcott
- Flux & Samson v Moldova
- Lindon & Others v France
- Jules Rimet Cup Ltd v The Football Association Ltd
- Sheffield Wednesday FC & ors v Hargreaves
- Radu v Houston & Another (No.2)
- Charman v Orion Publishing Group & others (No.3) (CA)
- Glas Nadezhda EOOD & Elenkov v Bulgaria
- L’Oreal S.A. v Bellure N.V. and others
- Bluck v The Information Commissioner and Epsom & St Helier University NHS Trust
- Nike European Operations Netherlands BV v Rosicky
- Murray v Express Newspapers plc & Another
- Re LM (Reporting Restrictions: Coroner’s Inquest)
- In re Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
- Grovit v De Nederlandsche Bank & Ors
- Roberts & Another v Gable & others (CA)
- T (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v BBC
- McBride v Body Shop International plc
- Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Flux v Moldova (No 2)
- Re Bournemouth & Boscombe Athletic Community Football Club Ltd (CA)
- Jones v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Burstein v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd & Others v Vetplus Ltd (CA)
- Flux v Moldova (No.3)
- Sheffield United Football Club Ltd v Football Association Premier League Ltd
- Drury v Carnegie (CA)
- Chelsea FC v Mutu (CAS)
- Saim Üstün v Turkey
- Smithkline Beecham & Others v Avery & Webb
- Buckley v Dalziel
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.8) (HL)
- Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical Co Ltd & Ors
- Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- RWE NPower v Carrol & Others
- Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd & Others v Vetplus Ltd (ChD)
- Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Davies v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc
- Horseracing Regulatory Authority v Byrne & Others
- De Landtsheer Emmanuel v Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne
- Purnell v F1 Business Magazine Ltd & Another
- Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Copland v UK
- Edwards v Golding & Others (CA)
- Jane Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation & Others
- Re Ward; BBC v CAFCASS Legal & Ors
- Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group Ltd (CA)
- Johnson v Medical Defence Union (No.2) (CA)
- Stretford v The Football Association Ltd & Another (CA)
- Huntingdon Life Sciences Group plc v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
- Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd & Ors (CA)
- Attorney General v BBC
- Campaign Against Arms Trade v BAE Systems Plc
- Nikowitz & Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v Austria
- Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd (No.2) (CA)
- Horseracing Regulatory Authority v Fitzpatrick & Others
- Connolly v DPP
- Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Moore v Scottish Daily Record
- Cembrit Blunn Ltd & Anr v Apex Roofing Services LLP & Anr
- L v L and H (a firm)
- Kommersant Moldovy v Moldova
- HRH The Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers (No.3) (CA)
- Wakefield v Channel Four Television & Others (No.3)
- Fisher v Brooker & Onward Music Ltd
- High Tech International AG & Others v Deripaska
- Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2) (Costs)
- Andrews v Television New Zealand
- Turkot & Global GOLD Holding v Oxus Gold & Trew
- Karman v Russia
- McKennitt v Ash (CA)
- Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v Austria
- Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v Austria (No.2)
- R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire
- sterreichischer Rundfunk v Austria
- SD Marine Ltd v Powell
- O2 Holdings Ltd & Anor v Hutchison 3G Ltd (CA)
- CC v AB
- R (Animal Defenders International) v Culture Secretary (DC)
- Radu v Houston & Another (CA)
- Barrett v Rosenthal
- Barton v Home Office
- X & Y v Persons Unknown
- Norfolk County Council v Webster & Others
- R v B
- Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England
- Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (No.2) (HL)
- West Bromwich Albion FC v El-Safty
- Zakharov v Russia
- L’Oreal S.A. v Bellure N.V. and others
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill
- Wainwright v United Kingdom
- White v Sweden
- Al-Koronky v Time-Life Entertainment Group Ltd & Another (CA)
- Fallon v Horseracing Regulatory Authority
- McKenna v MGN Ltd
- Proform Sports Management Ltd v Proactive Sports Managment Ltd & Stretford
- Sunderland Housing Company & another v Baines & others
- DPP v Collins (HL)
- Hughes v Carratu International plc
- Universal International Inc v Flextech Rights Ltd
- Charman v Orion Publishing Group & others (No.3)
- Stone v South East Coast Strategic Health Authority & Others
- Veliu v Mazrekaj
- Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others (No.3) (QB)
- Clayton v Clayton
- Malik v Central Criminal Court & Another
- John v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Merelie v Newcastle Primary Health Care Trust & Others (No.3)
- Re Brampton Manor Trade Mark
- Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others (No.2) (CA)
- Adidas-Salomon AG v Draper & others
- Cox v MGN Ltd (Costs)
- Loughton Contracts Plc v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd
- Mahfouz and another v Brisard & another
- Baker v Maynard
- Grant v Google UK Ltd
- Al Amoudi v Brisard & Another
- Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Barrett v Universal-Island Records & Others
- Roberts & Another v Gable & others (QBD)
- Re Bournemouth & Boscombe Athletic Community Football Club Ltd
- Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc
- Mullins v Macfarlane & The Jockey Club
- Dammann v Switzerland
- Campbell v Safra
- Brasilier v France
- Sportswear SpA & Four Marketing Ltd v Stonestyle Ltd (CA)
- Fallon v MGN Ltd (No.2)
- Baigent & Another v The Random House Group Ltd
- Mahmood v Galloway & McKay
- Angel v Stainton & Another
- HRH The Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- Stretford v The Football Association Ltd & Another
- Purnell v Business F1 Magazine Ltd & Another
- Bunt v Tilley & Others
- Henry v BBC (No.3)
- Radu v Houston & Another
- Johnson v Medical Defence Union Ltd (No 2)
- Lowe v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Harrods Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd (No.2)
- Moss v Channel Five Broadcasting Ltd
- Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Galloway v Telegraph Group Ltd (CA)
- Howlett v Holding (No. 4)
- Harrods Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd (ChD)
- Hussein v William Hill
- Albert-Engelmann-Gesellschaft mbH v Austria
- HRH The Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- R v Central Criminal Crown Court, ex parte Times Newspapers & Ors
- Jockey Club v Keightley & others
- In the case of Mariano Puerta
- McKennitt v Ash (QBD)
- West Bromwich Albion FC v El-Safty
- Birmingham City Council v H
- Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften-Verlagsgesellschaft v Austria (No.3)
- BBC v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, X and Y
- Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others (No.2)
- Ascension Securities Limited v The Motley Fool Limited
- Henry v BBC (No.2)
- Musa King v Telegraph Group Ltd (Costs)
- Rodrigues v Portugal
- Polydor & Ors v Brown & Ors
- Tourancheau & July v France
- Harper v Information Commissioner
- Henry v BBC
- Johnson v Perot Systems Europe Ltd & Another
- Brown v Mcasso Music Productions Ltd
- Culnane v Morris & Another
- Ratiu & Others v Conway (CA)
- Cray v Hancock & Another
- Taylor v Rive Droit Music Ltd
- Wakefield v Channel Four Television & Others
- Ali Erol v Turkey (No 2)
- Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften-Verlags GmbH v Austria
- Beckham & Another v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Campbell v MGN Ltd (Costs) HL
- Synthon BV v SmithKline Beecham plc
- Global Projects Management Ltd & Anor v Citigroup Inc & Ors
- R (Mullins) v Appeal Board of the Jockey Club
- Charman v Orion Publishing Group & others (No.2)
- Clearsprings Management Ltd v Businesslinx Ltd
- GMG Radio Holdings v Tokyo Project Ltd
- Daikin Europe N.V. v Daikin International Ltd
- Savitchi v Moldova
- Panday v Gordon
- Jockey Club v Carter & Others
- Mahfouz and another v Brisard and another
- Bangoura v Washington Post & Others
- Flaherty v National Greyhound Racing Club Ltd
- Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd v Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd
- R (Grierson) v Ofcom
- Wistbray Ltd v Creative Nature Ltd
- A (A Local Authority) v PD & Another
- Al-Koronky v Time-Life Entertainment Group Ltd & Another (QB)
- Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others (CA)
- Laboratoires Goëmar SA v La Mer Technology Inc
- Sales v Stromberg & others
- R (Gazette Media) v Teeside Crown Court
- London General Holdings v USP Holdings plc
- Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Racing UK Ltd
- Leeds Rugby Ltd v Harris & Bradford Bulls Holdings Ltd
- Re W
- Three Rivers Council & BCCI v Bank of England
- A v B, C & D
- British Horse Racing Board v William Hill Organization Ltd
- Bradley v The Jockey Club (No.3)
- Georgallides v Etzin
- Société des produits Nestlé SA v Mars UK Ltd
- A & B v Channel Four
- Steinberg v Pritchard Englefield (No 2)
- Bradley v The Jockey Club (No.2)
- Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd
- Sofola v Lloyds TSB Bank plc
- DPP v Collins
- X v BBC and Lion Television Ltd
- Charman v Orion Publishing Group & others
- Covance Laboratories Inc v PETA Europe Ltd
- Independent News & Media v Ireland
- Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- McKeith v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- E v Channel Four & Another
- Harb v King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz
- Interfact Ltd & Pablo Ltd v Liverpool City Council
- Hyperion Records Ltd v Sawkins
- O’Riordan v DPP
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 8) (CA)
- Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd
- Campbell-James v Guardian Media Group plc
- Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Another
- Turcu v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Creative Resins International Ltd v Glasslam Europe Ltd & Others
- Mahfouz & Ors v Ehrenfeld & Anor
- Deloitte & Touche v Dickson & Others
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No.4)
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No.3)
- Jockey Club v Carphone Warehouse Ltd
- Crossland v Wilkinson Hardware Stores Ltd
- Fraser-Woodward Ltd v BBC & Brighter Pictures Ltd
- Rackham v Sandy & Others (No.2)
- Chief Constable of Greater Manchester v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd
- Turcu v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Practice Direction (Applications for Reporting Restriction Orders)
- Practice Note (Applications for Reporting Restriction Orders)
- Matadeen v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Jockey Club v Matthew Batchelor
- Milne v David Price Solicitors & Advocates
- Steinberg v Pritchard Englefield & other
- Collins Stewart Limited & Another v The Financial Times Ltd (No 2)
- Friend v Civil Aviation Authority & Others
- Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd & Others
- IPC Media Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Rackham v Sandy and Others
- Smith v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc
- Steel & Morris v United Kingdom
- Fallon v MGN Ltd
- Polanski v Conde Nast Publications Ltd (HL)
- W v Westminster City Council (No.2)
- Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (No.2) (CA)
- Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co. Inc.
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Halis v Turkey
- Sciacca v Italy
- Busuioc v Moldova
- Hewitt & Others v Grunwald & Others
- IPC Media Ltd v Highbury SPL Publishing Ltd
- Nail v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Others (CA)
- R v Burrell
- Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others (QB)
- Cumpana and Mazare v Romania
- Pedersen and Baadsgaard v Denmark (No.2)
- Allport v Wilbraham
- Novello & Co Ltd v Keith Prowse Music Publishing Co Ltd (CA)
- R v Barnes
- W v Westminster CC & Others
- Chan U Seek v Alvis Vehicles Ltd
- Hipgrave v Jones
- Wood v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (CA)
- Blunkett v Quinn
- Galloway v Telegraph Group Ltd (QBD)
- Attorney-General v Express Newspapers
- Mensah v Jones
- Gazley v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- R (Nilsen) v Governor of HMP Full Sutton & Another (CA)
- Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v Finland
- Selisto v Finland
- Merelie v Newcastle Primary Health Care Trust & Others
- British Horseracing Board v William Hill
- Johnson v Medical Defence Union Ltd
- Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Another
- Richardson v Schwarzenegger & Others
- In re S (FC) (A Child) (HL)
- Celador Productions Ltd v Melville
- Financial Services Authority v Fradley and Woodward
- Collins Stewart Ltd & Another v The Financial Times Ltd
- King v Lewis & Others (CA)
- News Group Newspapers Ltd v Douglass Consultancy Services Ltd
- Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee & Others (HL)
- Bradley v Jockey Club
- Sabou & Pircalab v Romania
- Yazar and others v Turkey
- Thompson v Mitchell
- Mullins v Jockey Club
- Navitaire Inc v Easyjet Airline Co & Another
- Phonographic Performance Ltd v DTI
- Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd (CA)
- Sony v Ball
- Jennings v Buchanan
- Mahfouz v Brisard & Others
- Pelling v Bruce-Williams
- Chauvy & Ors v France
- von Hannover v Germany
- Hamilton v Clifford
- Hassan v Holburn and others
- Independent Publishing Co Ltd v AG of Trinidad & Tobago & Others
- Milne v Express Newspapers (CA)
- Pal v General Medical Council and others
- Brighton & Dubbeljoint v Jones
- Musa King v Telegraph Group Ltd (CA)
- Carr v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Others
- Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel Four Television Corpn & Another
- Campbell v MGN Ltd (HL)
- Cox v Jones
- Arief International Inc v Celador International Ltd
- Building Product Design Ltd v Sandtoft Roof Tiles Ltd
- Novello & Co Ltd v Keith Prowse Music Publishing Co Ltd (ChD)
- Oliver v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police (No.2)
- Re X & Y
- Maccaba v Lichtenstein (No 2 – mode of trial)
- Cyprotex Discovery Ltd v University of Sheffield
- Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd v Alfred McAlpine plc
- Radio France & Ors v France
- Nail v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Others (QBD)
- Hosking v Runting & Others
- Jockey Club v Rodgers
- Fahey v Jockey Club
- Meade v Pugh & Another
- Re B (A Child) (Disclosure)
- Coys Limited v Autocherish Limited & others
- Reed Executive plc & Another v Reed Business Information Ltd & Others
- Lennon v Scottish Daily Record & Sunday Mail
- USP Strategies plc & Anor v London General Holdings Ltd & Ors
- Howe & Co v Burden
- Sharma v Jay & Others (No.2)
- Phillipps v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Another
- King v Lewis
- Worme & Another v Commissioner of Police of Grenada
- Bedford v The Number (UK) Ltd
- Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe
- Fayed v BBC
- Miguel Torres SA v Cantine Mezzacorona SCARL
- R (Nilsen) v Governor of HMP Full Sutton & Another
- Luke & Another v Wansbroughs (a firm) & Another
- Paddick v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Durant v Financial Services Authority
- Miles v ITV Networks Ltd & Another
- Wood v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police
- Griggs Group Ltd & Others v Evans & Others
- Re Roddy (A Minor); Torbay Borough Council v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Office
- Jameel & Another v Wall Street Journal Europe (CA)
- Attorney General v MGN Ltd
- Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Polanski v Conde Nast Publications Ltd (CA)
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.6)
- Jameel & Another v Times Newspapers Ltd
- One Honest Man Inc v BBC
- Wainwright v Home Office
- Oliver v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police
- Pedder v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Downtex v Flatley
- Vassiliev v Amazon.com Inc
- Powell v Boladz & others
- Paddick v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Blake v Associated Newspapers Limited
- D v L
- Gray v Avadis
- Oduro v Time Life
- Peer International Corp v Termidor Music Editora Musical de Cuba
- Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation v Wall Street Journal Europe (No.2)
- Greenaway and Williams v Poole
- Sheikha Mouza al Misnad v Azzaman Ltd & Others
- Gleaner Co v Abrahams
- In re S (A Child) (CA)
- Milne v Express Newspapers (No.2)
- Archer v Williams
- Reuben & Others v Time Inc & Another (No.2)
- Keays v Guardian Newspapers Ltd & Others
- Stallwood & Stallwood v Smith
- Johnson v Home Office
- Pedersen and Baadsgaard v Denmark
- Gabrin v Universal Music Operations & Another
- Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd
- Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corp v Wall Street Journal Europe
- Associated Newspapers Ltd & Another v Express Newspapers
- Maris & Others v Walsh
- Musa King v Telegraph Group Ltd (QBD)
- Lord Ashcroft v Attorney General & Others
- Tolkien v Birmingham Sunday Mercury
- Bloomsbury Publishing Group Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Confetti Records & Others v Warner Music UK Ltd
- Miller Brewing Company v The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company
- Webster v British Gas Services Ltd
- Harrods Ltd v Dow Jones & Co Inc
- Butters v Clarkson
- X (formerly known as Mary Bell) & Y v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Ors
- Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd (No.1) (CA)
- R (Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC & Others
- Adams v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
- Bloomsbury Publishing Group Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Others
- Charterhouse Clinical Research Unit Ltd v Richmond Pharmacology Ltd
- Sharma v Jay & Others
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.5)
- Singer & Friedlander Commercial Finance Ltd v Thomas
- Irvine v Talksport Ltd
- Covance Laboratories v J
- Bennett & Another v BBC & Another
- Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc
- Kearns v General Council of the Bar
- ICN Photonics Ltd v Patterson
- Rigg v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Jockey Club v Bradley
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.4)
- Howlett v Holding and Holding & Barnes Plc
- Tanner v Filby and Howell
- Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee & Another (CA)
- Halford v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary & Another
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.2)
- Cleese v Clark & Associated Newspapers Limited
- Peck v United Kingdom
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.3)
- Attorney General v Punch Ltd & Another
- Brinn & Jarvis v Russell Jones & Walker (a firm)
- Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd and others (No. 8)
- Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co Inc
- Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Lakah Group and Lakah v Al Jazeera and Mansour (No 2)
- Milne v Express Newspapers (QBD)
- Bamgboye v Reed & Others
- Times Newspapers Ltd v Burstein
- A & others v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others
- Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd and others (No. 7)
- Komarek v Ramco Energy Plc
- Clarke v Davey
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Spencer v Sillitoe and International Computers Ltd
- Wilkey & Another v BBC
- Campbell v Frisbee
- Campbell v MGN Ltd (CA)
- Warheit v Olympia Tools Ltd
- Foster & Another v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jockey Club v Buffham
- Bataille v Newland & Ors
- Campbell v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council & Others (No.2)
- Fayed v Telegraph Group Ltd
- MacIntyre v Phillips
- Mawdsley v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
- Wallis v Valentine
- Mills v MGN Ltd
- Gregson v Channel Four Television
- McManus v Beckham
- Dorgan v Home Office (joined with Anderton v Clwyd CC)
- Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd
- Psychology Press Limited v Nelson Thornes Limited & Another
- Bonnick v Morris
- Lord Ashcroft v Attorney-General & Department for International Development
- Mark v Associated Newspapers Limited
- Cook & Carlton Communications Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- Hamilton v Al Fayed (No 2)
- McVicar v United Kingdom
- Lovell v Pembrokeshire County Cricket Club
- Kinch v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Allason & Anor v Random House UK Ltd
- Attorney-General v MGN Ltd
- Campbell v MGN Ltd (QBD)
- R v Shayler
- Ferguson v Associated Newspapers Limited
- R (Persey) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Gaddafi v Telegraph Group Ltd (No.3)
- Gillick v Brook Advisory Centres & Another (No.2)
- A v B plc (Flitcroft v MGN Ltd)
- Interbrew SA v Financial Times Ltd & Others
- H v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- R v L
- Ludlow Music Ltd v Williams & Others (No.2)
- Theakston v MGN Limited
- Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council & others
- English & Another v Hastie & Another
- Kiam v MGN Ltd
- Colbeck v Ferguson & Another
- Sony Computer Entertainment v Owen
- RWD Technologies Ltd v Gibbs & Others
- Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd and others (Nos. 2-5)
- Carpenter v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- ABC v Lenah Game Meats
- Cook & Carlton Communications plc v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research & Marketing
- Donnelly & Others v Young & Another
- Best v Charter Medical of England Ltd
- Colgan v Kennel Club
- Allason v Random House UK Limited
- Modahl v British Athletic Federation Ltd (No 2)
- Radio Taxicabs (London) Ltd v Owner Drivers Radio Taxi Services Ltd
- Medway Council v BBC
- Hamilton v Milroy-Sloan
- London Regional Transport v Mayor of London
- Berezovsky v Forbes Inc & Michaels (No.2)
- R (Ford) v Press Complaints Commission
- Gillick v Brook Advisory Centres & Another
- R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Associated Newspapers & Others
- Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Baldwin v Rusbridger
- McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.4)
- Re Gracie Attard
- WB v H Bauer Publishing Ltd
- McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.3)
- Mills v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Branson v Bower
- Elite Model Agency v BBC
- R v Sherwood ex parte Telegraph Group & Others
- Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd and others (No. 4)
- Alexander v Arts Council of Wales
- O’Shea v MGN Limited
- Milne v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Clibbery v Allan
- Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd and others
- Imutran Ltd v Uncaged Campaigns Ltd
- Venables & Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Douglas v Hello! Ltd
- Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Safeway v Tate
- Phonographic Performance Ltd v South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
- Ludlow Music Inc v Williams & Others
- Raducan v IOC
- Ruddy v Mercury Personal Communications Ltd
- Gaddafi v Telegraph Group Ltd (No.2)
- Trinity Mirror plc & Another v Punch Ltd
- Hickey v Marks
- Carden v The Jockey Club
- Parker v Rasalingham
- Berezovsky v Forbes Inc & Michaels
- Gilbert v MGN Ltd
- Phonographic Performance Ltd v Candy Rock Recording Ltd
- Hamilton v Fayed
- WH Smith v Colman
- McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd (No.2)
- GKR Karate v Yorkshire Post Ltd (No 2)
- GKR Karate v Yorkshire Post Ltd
- Ryder v Nicholl & Anor
- Gaddafi v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Christoffer v Poseidon Film Distributors Ltd
- Dwek v Macmillan Publishers Ltd & Others
- McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Barclay v United Kingdom
- Service Corp International plc & Anor v Channel Four Television Corp & Anor
- Ex parte News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd
- Nicholls v BBC
- Performing Right Society Ltd v Boizot
- Emaco v Dyson Appliances Ltd
- Norman v Future Publishing
- Re G (Celebrities: Publicity)
- Basham v Gregory (No.2)
- Bunn v BBC
- Service Corporation International plc & Anor v Channel Four Television & Anor
- Michael O’Mara Books Ltd & Others v Express Newspapers plc
- Marks & Spencer plc v Granada Television Ltd
- Spencer v United Kingdom
- Morgan v BBC
- Holley v Smyth
- Modahl v British Athletic Federation Ltd
- Brady v United Kingdom
- Aitken v Preston and Others
- Jones v Pollard
- Broxton v McClelland (No.2)
- M v BBC
- Stevenage Borough Football Club Ltd v The Football League Ltd
- Goodwin v United Kingdom
- Basham v Gregory
- Essex County Council v Mirror Group Newspapers Limited
- Tolstoy Miloslavsky v United Kingdom
- Island Records Ltd v Tring International Plc
- Petronelli v Collins
- Godfrey v Lees
- Charleston & Smith v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Broxton v McClelland
- A&M Records Ltd & Anr v Video Collection International Ltd
- McDonalds Corp v Steel and Morris
- Time Warner v Channel 4 Television
- Reed International Books v King & Prior Limited
- Charlton v EMAP plc and others
- R v Disciplinary Committee of the Jockey Club, ex parte Aga Khan
- Warren v Marsh
- ex parte Coventry Newspapers Ltd
- Watson v Prager and Another
- Malcolm v Oxford University Press
- Brent Walker Group Plc v Time Out Ltd
- Singer v The Jockey Club
- R v Jockey Club, ex p RAM Racecourses Ltd
- Prowess Racing Ltd v Jason Plato
- Kaye v Robertson & Sport Newspapers Ltd
- Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
- R v Disciplinary Committee of the Jockey Club, ex p Massingberd-Mundy
- In re a Company’s Application
- US Tobacco v BBC
- Re L (a minor)
- Barnett v Crozier
- Attorney-General v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Nichols Advanced Vehicle Systems Inc & Ors v Rees, Oliver & Ors
- Williams v Reason
- Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz
- Greig v Insole
- Nichols Advanced Vehicle Systems Inc & Ors v Rees, Oliver & Ors
- Cobain v Information Commissioner & CPS
Articles & Publications
- From privacy to publicity: controlling the disclosure of allegations of abuse in litigation
- Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings 19th Edition, 1st Supplement
- £6000 damages awarded for Council’s misuse of private financial information and GDPR breaches (Bekoe v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington)
- Gatley on Libel and Slander 13th edition
- DPA 2018 immigration exemption unlawful: the legislative response
- High Court refuses application for trial of preliminary issues in defamation claim (Bindel v PinkNews)
- Duncan & Neill on Defamation and other media communications claims – 5th Edition
- High Court refuses application for strike out and summary judgment in libel and malicious falsehood claim (Ward v Associated Newspapers Ltd)
- How to get a libel injunction
- Decision to lift reporting restrictions upheld prior to final welfare hearing (Al Maktoum v Al Hussein)
- 5RB Podcast – Data subject access requests
- The Pupillage Podcast: Media & Defamation Law
- LexisNexis Information Law Practice Note – Applications for interim injunctions for breach of privacy
- LexisNexis Information Law Practice Note – Misuse of Private Information
- When legally privileged material is accidentally sent to a recipient (Advertising Standards Authority Ltd v Mitchell)
- Duncan and Neill on Defamation Fourth edition
- Get Social Media Savvy
- Recent Issues in Person Unknown cases
- Anonymity Orders in Harassment Claims: Khan (formerly JMO) v Khan (formerly KTA) [2018] EWHC 241 (QB)
- Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 22nd Edition
- Actors’ Moral Rights: Being Replaced In A Film
- Bullen & Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings 18th ed with 1st Supplement (Book & eBook Pack)
- 5RB Podcast – The Lachaux decision ramifications for Serious Harm
- Restrictions on Media Communications in the Interests of Truth and Privacy
- Government Twitter and Freedom of Expression by Christina Michalos
- The future under the e-Privacy Directive
- Vicarious liability for misuse of private information
- Protecting Public Officials and Corporates – Q&A
- Legal Issues of Blogging
- Responsible journalism—the ethics of press leaks
- High profile divorce fuels discussion on family court reporting – Appleton v Gallagher
- Harassment by Publication – Abridged Extract
- The Law of Privacy and the Media 3rd Edition
- Privacy, the Internet and Social Media – Abridged Extract
- Golden Eye ‘pay or else’ letters
- Photos of celebrities’ children—does Paul Weller’s case muddy the waters of media law?
- How much is too much? Privacy damages and phone-hacking
- The Supreme Court decision in OPO v MLA
- An affair to remember – defamation following the Ashley Madison hack
- When are website operators liable for user comments? – Delfi AS v Estonia
- Statements in open court – ANL v Murray
- The Journey of Gibraltar’s Football Association
- Libel and Slander – The Defamation Act 2013
- Section 1 Defamation Act 2013: Will the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader be replaced by that of the twitter troll?
- Data Protection – Key Issues 2015
- The DPA s. 32 exemption: what is journalism?
- Father’s book shelved to protect son
- Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, 21st edition
- A Libel Revolution?
- Defamation County Court – Why Not?
- The shrinking scope for anonymity in the Court of Protection
- The Defamation Act 2013 – 6 months on
- Kennedy v The Charity Commission: A New Zealand Perspective
- “You say tomato”: A Comparison of English and US Privacy Law Principles
- Free Speech Online
- Media Law and Ethics in the 21st Century
- News-Gathering and the Protection from Harassment Act
- The Section 5 Defamation Act 2013 Regulations: Cumbersome and of Questionable Benefit?
- Sport: Law and Practice, 3rd edition
- Gatley on Libel & Slander, 9th, 10th, 11th & 12th editions
- Blackstone’s Guide to the Defamation Act 2013
- Proximity to fame, privacy and copyright ownership
- Data protection and the prank callers
- Non-disclosure injunctions – the new landscape
- Supporting a free press and high standards – approaches to Regulation
- The PCC Time for last rites?
- Now we know what they are, where do we go from here?
- Tugendhat & Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, Second Edition
- Reporting Ancillary Relief Proceedings: An Update
- Borrie & Lowe: The Law of Contempt
- Libel Reform – Common law development or statutory codification?
- Interim Injunctions and the Overlap between Privacy and Libel
- Reduced ‘uplift’s on libel CFAs – why the hurry?
- The Jury’s Out
- Entertainment and Media Law Reports
- Think Again
- The Current State of English Defamation Law
- Media Access to the Family Courts: the Latest Proposals
- Preventing Publication of Private Information
- Are the hunters becoming the hunted? The role of the paparazzi after recent rulings
- Paper given to the President’s Conference (Judicial Studies Board)
- In The Name of the Law: Nominative Determinism
- Reportage: A Not Entirely Neutral Report
- Gatley on Libel & Slander, 9th, 10th and 11th edition
- Kiss & Tell Stories and Snatched Photographs
- Article 8: The use of private correspondence in claims for ancillary relief
- 5RB Client Complaints Procedure
- The Trials of Art (ed. Daniel McClean)
- Electronic Harassment – Steps to Protect Employees
- Reynolds privilege and Jameel v Wall Street Journal
- Join the parties – CPR 5.4
- Towards transparency in the family justice system
- Freedom of Information Act 2000
- Children, experts and open justice in the Family Division
- Libel and Publication in the Public Interest
- Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt
- What is ‘Identical’ following Reed and Compass
- Trade Marks and Olympic Symbols
- Shape Marks and the Misshapen Monopoly
- Merchandising Fame
- Moral Rights and Site-Specific Art Works
- Image Rights and Privacy: After Douglas v Hello!
- Recent Practical Issues in Defamation
- A review of recent developments in the law of privacy and the media
- Freedom of Information Act 2000: enhanced access to information
- Recent Developments in Defamation
- The Princess, the Paparazzi and the Press
- Law of Photography and Digital Images
- The Copyright and Related Rights Regulations
- Review Special Issue on Privacy 2003 EHR Law
- Overview of The Copyright and Related Rights Regulations
- Subject Access and Government Secrecy
- Sport and the Registration of Movement Marks
- Harry Potter and the John Doe injunction
- CPR disclosure and the Data Protection Act 1998
- Disclosure of journalists sources revisited
- When is a judge not a judge?
- Prior restraint of media publications
- Criminal contempt – third party liability
- Grobbelaar: Pyrrhic victory as libel jury’s verdict restored.
- Mr Justice Eady’s Talk at the launch of The Law of Privacy & The Media
- Damages for press republication of slander
- Disclosure of journalists’ sources
- The Law of Privacy and the Media
- Harry Potter and the Case of the False Evidence
- Defamation Law Reform: A Missed Opportunity?
- Cartoons and the law of libel
- Court’s power to overturn awards of damages
- Saving Face is all a matter of image for the famous
- Libel: extending the limitation period
- Series of newspaper articles can constitute harassment
- Criminal contempt – third party liability
- Law of confidence extended to protect right to life
- Court recognises right of privacy
- Divergent Views of the European Commission and Court of Human Rights
- Free Press and Fair Trial: Challenges and Change
- The Press, the Courts and the Consititution
News Posts
- London International Disputes Week 2025 (LIDW)
- Farewell and our heartfelt thanks to Jackie Garnham
- Preliminary issue judgment in Aluko v Barton
- 5RB Barristers appear in Gibraltar public inquiry
- Frank Warren v Chris Eubank Jr – boxing claim goes to trial on meaning
- Meaning ruling in comedian’s libel claim
- Conference 5RB 2025 – Thank you!
- A new Silk for 5RB
- Media parties successful in Yang Tengbo v SSHD access to court documents case
- Telegraph apologises to Zia Chishti
- Observer apologises to Douglas Murray
- Andrew Bridgen v Matt Hancock
- Clara Hamer is back from maternity leave
- Felicity McMahon elected to Middle Temple Bench
- Clarke trial begins
- Second appeal refused in Clarke v GNM
- Appeal dismissed in Clarke v GNM
- Opinion and meaning determined in Ware v Waters & Al Jazeera
- Headteacher harassment case settles
- 5RB hosts BVL and PASS Internships
- Conference5RB 2025 – Programme released!
- John Ware’s Defamation Case Against Roger Waters and Al Jazeera: Preliminary Issues Heard in Court
- Access to court documents sought in Yang Tengbo v SoS for the Home Department
- Court dismisses application to strike out defence in Clarke v GNM
- Jacob Dean appointed as KC
- Important Appeal Against Judges’ Anonymity Handed Down
- Landmark Admission by News Group Newspapers Over Unlawful Information Gathering
- Landmark privacy trial against News Group
- Clarke v The Guardian PTR
- Reporting Restrictions Re: The Sharif Children
- Amazon knocks out boxing film libel and privacy claims
- Significant judgment on reporting privilege
- Anonymity Order lifted in H6 v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Permission Granted to Publish Historic Materials Relating to Sara Sharif
- 5RB hosts event for Big Voice London students
- Holiday opening hours
- Statins statement in open court
- The Law of Privacy and The Media (4th edition)
- The University of Law Pupillage Virtual Fair
- TPI on meaning in a data protection claim
- Online Safety Panel at QMUL
- Middle Temple Scholars Exhibition Launches
- Reporting privilege in the Court of Appeal
- 5RB announces partnership with Bringing (Dis)Ability to the Bar (BDABar)
- High Court strikes out privacy and data protection claim
- Tommy Robinson jailed for contempt
- Northcott v Hundeyin
- Laurence Fox granted Permission to Appeal
- 5RB in Chambers & Partners 2025
- Sweet Bobby documentary launches on Netflix
- Judgment in FT application for non-party access to documents
- Conference: Reputation, Privacy and the Future of Media Law
- 5RB welcomes new Pupil
- 5RB welcomes two new tenants
- 5RB ranked as Top Tier and Leading Set at The Legal 500 2025
- Celebrating 75 years of women silks – excellence in advocacy
- Double win for 5RB at the Legal 500 Bar Awards 2024
- Webinar for the Next Generation Media Lawyers
- Conference5RB 2025 – Register here
- Full Fact complaint upheld against Daily Express
- Dyson discontinues libel claim against Channel 4 News
- Pegasus Scholarship Trust
- Jonathan Scherbel-Ball appointed to AG’s ‘A’ Panel of Counsel
- 5RB shortlisted at the Legal 500 Awards 2024
- Judgment entered for Dr Ashti Hawrami on OCCRP’s statutory reporting defence
- Judge makes Final Transparency Order in Kyle Walker family court proceedings
- Lord Tom Watson & Sir Vince Cable v News Group Newspapers
- Jonathan Scherbel-Ball appointed as Fee Paid Judge of the First Tier Tribunal
- Dale Vince innuendo case struck out
- 5RB Welcomes Bar Placement Week Students
- Harcombe / Kendrick preliminary trial judgment
- Preliminary Issues judgment in Bridgen v Hancock
- Lily Walker-Parr selected as one of four new trustees of the National Justice Museum
- Supreme Court allows Mueen-Uddin appeal
- Conference5RB announcement
- Preliminary issues determined in ‘The Lost King’ film claim
- Supreme Court allows appeal in part in George v Cannell
- Andrew Bridgen MP v Matt Hancock MP: trial of preliminary issues
- 5RB recognised as SILVER Pro Bono Patron 2024
- Preliminary issue judgment in Vine v Barton
- Who’s Who Legal 2024
- London International Disputes Week
- Statement in open court in Davies v BBC
- ThoughtLeaders4 – The Media Disputes: Defamation, Privacy & Reputation Management Forum
- Vine v Barton: trial of preliminary issues
- Permission to Appeal refused in Sir James Dyson v MGN Ltd
- High Court allows appeal on abuse of process in data protection claim
- Judgment on remedies in Blake & Seymour v Fox
- 5RB barristers in Gibraltar public inquiry
- NGN hacking claimants to proceed to trial
- High Court refuses Solicitor General permission to bring contempt proceedings against protestor
- 5RB Charity Quiz 2024
- Preliminary issue judgment in Amersi v BBC
- Judgment handed down in Andrew Bridgen MP v Matt Hancock MP strike-out application
- 5RB sponsors Best Actor award at Critics’ Circle Theatre Awards
- High Court awards £90,000 damages to West End actor and theatre producer, Simon Schofield
- Andrew Bridgen MP v Matt Hancock MP
- Court to determine meaning of film ‘The Lost King’
- Meaning decision in Dyson v C4
- Aidan Eardley KC appointed Deputy High Court Judge
- 5RB hosts BVL student internship
- Indemnity costs after Mirror hacking trial
- Judgment in rare slander trial
- A ‘SLAPP’ Struck Out: NI Court Finds Proceedings are Abuse of Process
- Judgment in Blake and others v Fox
- Pupillage: 5RB seeking to recruit for 2025
- Richard Rampton KC
- Source protection in the High Court
- David Sherborne named The Times Lawyer of the Week
- Bermuda CA dismisses injunction appeal
- Judgment in Mirror phone hacking trial
- Dyson v Channel 4 & ITN: trial of preliminary issues
- Holiday opening hours
- 5RB hosts Media Law Insight Evening for BVL students
- Greg Callus named Media, Privacy & Information Law ‘Junior of the Year’
- Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd: strike out / summary judgment handed down
- Statements in Open Court in Mobile Telephone Interception Litigation
- Judgment in Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited
- Mincione v Gedi – strike-out application dismissed
- Coombs v ICO and The Buckinghamshire Grammar Schools FTT trial begins
- Laurence Fox twitter trial commences in High Court
- Statement in open court in Hague v TML
- Consequentials hearing in Lawrence & Ors v Associated
- Dyson v MGN: Libel trial begins
- Lawrence & Ors v Associated privacy claims can go to trial
- Claims dismissed in libel and harassment actions in Miller & Power v Turner
- Net Benefit? The Online Safety Bill receives Royal Assent
- Therapist awarded £75,000 in defamation and harassment damages against former colleague
- Supreme Court to hear abuse of process appeal in Mueen-Uddin v SSHD
- Daedone & Ors v BBC
- Clarke v Guardian News & Media Ltd: Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Ghenavat and others v Simon Lyons: Defendant ordered to pay £191,000 on account of costs
- 5RB tops rankings in Chambers & Partners
- Heather Rogers KC
- Ruling in corporate libel claims over links to former Kazakh President
- George v Cannell in the Supreme Court
- Claimant awarded significant damages in Aaronson v Stones libel action
- 5RB and Hiscox panel on AI
- Former King of Spain wins claim
- 5RB named Tier 1 set in Defamation and privacy by The Legal 500
- Ghenavat and others v Simon Lyons: Defendant found liable in harassment
- We welcome our newest tenant and pupils
- New edition of Clerk & Lindsell published
- New edition of Information Rights published
- 5RB and members celebrate shortlist
- Gabby and Kenny Logan paid substantial damages over libels
- 5RB talks – Manchester
- Stephen Bear ordered to pay £207,900 in damages to Georgia Harrison
- Court of Appeal upholds undertakings in online harassment case
- Strike out judgment in Davidoff v Hargrave
- GEO TV seeks summary judgment
- Article on approaches to transparency in cases involving allegations of abuse
- 5RB barristers advise the McGrail Inquiry in Gibraltar
- Strike out hearing in harassment claim brought against former King of Spain
- Divisional Court hears Election Petition applications
- 5RB shortlisted in Legal 500 Bar Awards 2023
- Undertakings appeal in Smith v Backhouse
- Substantial damages for reality TV show victims
- Afghanistan Inquiry: Reporting restrictions sought
- Applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN
- Davidoff v Hargrave trial of preliminary issues
- 5RB welcomes Bar Placement students and mini pupils
- ‘Statin deniers’ libel trial begins today
- Lord Justice Warby appointed as a Judicial Commissioner of the JAC
- Claimant awarded £30,000 damages in Myanmar ‘informer’ libel action
- Decision to prohibit prisoner talking to media is quashed
- Court of Appeal hears nominal damages appeal
- 5RB supporting London Legal Walk 2023
- Transparency in the Financial Remedies Court: Report published
- NGN Ltd pays damages over criminal proceedings article
- Appeal dismissed in Stoute v NGN
- Statement in Dinah Rose KC case
- Alexandra Marzec appointed Deputy Master
- Stoute v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Phone hacking trial to begin
- Anonymity order lifted in Old Bailey murder
- 5RB Charity Quiz Night
- Adam Speker KC joins Middle Temple Bench
- Welcome to our newest tenant, Samuel Rowe, and farewell to Desmond Browne CBE KC
- Lawrence & Ors v Associated: four-day hearing begins
- Administrative Court gives guidance on correct RRO procedure
- Congratulations to Victoria Simon-Shore
- Strike out / summary judgment application in Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers
- High Court awards £25,000 damages to businesswoman and anti-bullying campaigner
- Arron Banks wins Cadwalladr TED Talk appeal
- Arron Banks wins Cadwalladr TED Talk appeal
- Injunction granted over tweets in Soriano v Silverstein
- Supreme Court win for flat owners in Fearn v Tate
- Jane Phillips named in The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’ list 2023
- Information Rights Tribunal dismisses Covid company loans appeal
- 5RB cases dominate Spear’s reputation cases roundup 2022
- Season’s Greetings
- Richard Hartley KC 1932-2022
- Aaronson v Stones libel trial begins
- Panorama reporter wins libel claim
- 5RB success at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2022
- Rachel Riley awarded £50,000 libel damages
- Substantial damages for reality show victim
- Court of Appeal hands down judgment on open justice in the Court of Protection
- 5RB tops 2023 Chambers UK Guide
- Statement in open court in international online harassment claim
- Article on reporting of financial remedies cases in family courts
- 5RB named top set by The Legal 500
- Rebekah Vardy ordered to pay indemnity costs
- Apology to John Ware
- Jane Phillips succeeds Justin Rushbrooke KC as Joint Head of Chambers
- 8th Biennial Conference5RB at the IET Savoy Place
- Second Hearing of Gibraltar public inquiry
- The passing of Queen Elizabeth II
- Chambers UK Bar Awards 2022
- The Bill of Rights Bill & freedom of speech
- Conference5RB 2022 sold out
- Rachel Riley decision upheld
- Coleen Rooney succeeds in truth defence in Vardy v Rooney
- Court of Appeal upholds decision to strike out libel claim as an abuse
- Andrew Caldecott QC takes up Associate Membership of 5RB
- Court of Appeal dismisses Guardian’s appeal in Duke of Edinburgh’s will case
- Conference5RB update
- Court of Appeal hands down judgment in George v Cannell
- Contemnor in online harassment case sentenced to six months
- Appeal in Riley v Murray
- Appeal over exclusion of press from Prince Philip’s will court case
- Conference5RB workshop preview
- The Lawyer Awards: litigation team of the year
- Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd: preliminary issue judgment handed down
- 5RB and members shortlisted in Legal 500 Bar Awards 2022
- Tilley brothers reporting restriction lifted
- 5RB recruiting third six pupil
- Libel claim in Haviland v Lownie is dismissed
- Pre-Trial Review in Millett v Corbyn
- 5RB Barristers appear in Gibraltar public inquiry
- Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd: trial of preliminary issues
- New Gatley published
- Wright v McCormack libel trial commences
- Judgment reserved in Vardy v Rooney
- New judgment in ‘MI5 agent’ case
- Desmond Browne QC takes up Associate Membership, Adrienne Page QC becomes new Joint Head of Chambers
- 5RB talks – ZXC v Bloomberg
- ‘MI5 agent’ case: Interim Injunction Granted
- Jurisdiction hearing in Andrew Neil v Jennifer Arcuri
- EMLR editor change
- Sir Charles Gray
- Statement in open court in Ashley v TNL
- BBC MI5 case: open hearing held
- Statement in open court in Arron Sykes v Melanie Shaw
- ‘MI5 agent’ case details released
- Attorney General v BBC: national security case to be partly in public
- Supreme Court judgment on criminal suspects’ privacy rights: ZXC v Bloomberg
- Queen’s Bench Guide 2022 published
- DPA 2018 exemption for immigration control: new Regulations in force
- Vardy v Rooney Hearing
- Jonathan Scherbel-Ball appointed to Advisory Council on National Records and Archives
- McCormack refused permission to appeal PTR decision
- Christina Michalos QC appointed Recorder
- ‘Reporting Financial Remedy Cases’: Adam Wolanski QC writes guest blog for FamilyArbitrator
- Footballer secures removal of 10-year-old Tweet from FA Disciplinary Decision
- 5RB congratulates Aidan Eardley on his appointment as Queen’s Counsel
- Landmark GDPR appeal allowed in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors
- Rachel Riley wins libel action against Laura Murray
- Christmas opening hours
- Joint Head of Chambers Justin Rushbrooke QC named The Times Lawyer of the Week
- Supreme Court to hear appeal in Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery
- Associated Newspapers’ appeal in claim by the Duchess of Sussex dismissed
- Supreme Court to hear ZXC v Bloomberg LP privacy appeal
- Chambers Bar Awards 2021
- Lloyd v Google Supreme Court decision
- Hearing over Mountbatten papers
- Permission to appeal granted in George v Cannell & Anor
- Google wins in Supreme Court
- Judgment handed down in George v Cannell & Anor
- Court of Appeal to consider the Defendant’s appeal in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers
- Summary judgment for solicitors in minimal data breach claim
- Tortoise launches podcast based on cat-fishing case
- Julie Bindel settles libel claim with PinkNews
- ECtHR upholds Article 8 breach in relation to reputation of a dead person
- 5RB top in 2022 Chambers Guide
- Statement in Open Court in Bell Shepard v Associated Newspapers Limited
- 5RB announces new tenants
- Euro-Millions lottery winner succeeds in striking out ex-partner’s libel claim
- NVTV libel claim dismissed: footage not in fact broadcast
- 5RB End of Trinity Term 2021 talk
- News from the Clerks’ Room
- Academic awarded £70,000 in damages over blog
- Claimant’s appeal dismissed in Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism
- Rebekah Vardy’s summary judgment application fails
- Claimant succeeds on slander preliminary issues
- Judgment in Lachaux
- Hearing in Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney
- MPS press release libel claim dismissed following trial
- Defendant’s appeal dismissed in Millett v Corbyn
- Can’t Pay? We’ll Take it Away! Statement in Open Court
- Johnny Depp loses appeal bid
- Jonathan Barnes formally appointed QC
- Mail pays libel damages to psychologist
- Lachaux s.4 trial heard remotely
- Emails about departure of former head of British Council in Italy not defamatory
- The Duchess of Sussex wins her privacy and copyright claim
- Barrister of the week: William Bennett QC
- Duke of Sussex libel settlement
- Nicklin J appointed Judge in Charge of Media and Communications List
- Adam Wolanski QC named as one of The Lawyer magazine’s Hot 100 for 2021
- Rachel Riley v Michael Sivier: defence struck out in libel claim
- Jonathan Barnes appointed to QC
- Sir James & Lady Deirdre Dyson v Associated Newspapers
- The Times pays libel damages to Barbara Hewson
- Successful defence for HarperCollins and author in mammoth Australian libel claim
- Meaning of Coleen Rooney’s social media posts determined in Vardy v Rooney libel case
- 5RB Wins Defamation, Privacy & Data Protection Awards
- Kent Online apologises to Alex Reid over phone hacking allegation
- Statement in Open Court in Mamadou Sakho v WADA
- Duncan & Neill on Defamation and other media and communications claims
- Johnny Depp loses “wife beater” libel claim
- 5RB the ‘go-to set’ in Legal 500
- 5RB stands out in 2021 Chambers UK Guide
- Desmond Browne QC receives CBE in Queen’s Birthday Honours
- Recorder appointments announced
- Chambers UK Bar Awards 2020
- 5RB announces new tenant
- How to get a libel injunction
- Defamation, Privacy and Reputation Management
- Melania Trump apology not defamatory of author
- Jonathan Scherbel-Ball appointed to the B Panel
- Court rules in favour of Duchess
- Sir Mark Warby appointed Lord Justice of Appeal
- Lord Sheikh receives apology in open court from Associated Newspapers
- Statements in Open Court for Labour Party whistleblowers and John Ware
- Court determines meaning of defamatory statements in libel case against Jeremy Corbyn
- Trial of Johnny Depp’s libel action against The Sun begins
- 5RB Annual Quiz 2020
- Apology given by blogger to local councillor in privacy claim
- Tinkler v Ferguson: court strikes out malicious falsehood claim
- Contacting 5RB during the Covid-19 lockdown
- Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Serafin
- Damages and injunction awarded in Facebook privacy claim
- Important Court of Appeal judgment on suspects’ privacy rights: ZXC v Bloomberg
- Aled Maclean-Jones to join HM Treasury
- Apology given to the The Register by Aria Taheri, founder and CEO of Aria Technology Ltd
- Major new decision dismissing claim of media harassment
- Judgment handed down in Duchess of Sussex’s case against Mail on Sunday
- Court determines meaning in Rachel Riley v Laura Murray libel case
- 5RB talks – the Supreme Court decision in the Morrisons data breach case
- Morrisons appeal allowed by Supreme Court
- New Practice Direction on Video or Audio Hearings released
- Coronavirus: Judicial guidance on court arrangements
- Important announcement – coronavirus
- 5RB members praised in Who’s Who Legal 2020
- Adam Speker formally takes silk
- 5RB is open for business
- 5RB plays major role in Al Maktoum v Al Hussein
- Court of Appeal to hear ZXC v Bloomberg LP privacy appeal
- Pre-trial review today in Johnny Depp libel action against The Sun
- Court refuses strike out in Enterprise Insurance libel case
- Statement in Open Court for Licensing Officer
- Brexit: business as usual for GDPR
- 5RB sponsors centenary of women in law dinner
- New Silk at 5RB
- Rare defamation decision in Chancery Division
- Meaning trial in claim by Mamadou Sakho against WADA
- Sir James & Lady Dyson v Associated Newspapers: trial of meaning
- Season’s Greetings from 5RB
- Credit report not defamatory
- Charles Elphicke v Times Newspapers Ltd: trial of meaning
- Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd: preliminary issues trial
- Australian court awards record damages
- Supreme Court Judgment awaited in “fascinating” Morrisons data claim
- High Court to hear Anna Turley defamation claim
- Supreme Court begins hearing Morrisons data claim
- 5RB sweeps the board at Bar Awards
- Alison Morgan QC vindicated re her role in the prosecution of Ben Stokes
- 5RB tops 2020 Chambers UK Guide
- Claimants denied anonymity in strip-club covert filming case
- 5RB ‘the market leader in the field of defamation and privacy law’
- Welcome to our newest tenant
- Celebrating 100 years of Women at the Bar
- 5RB proudly supports the Koestler Art Awards
- Marital confidence claim brought by businessman Bhanu Choudhrie struck out
- Changes to the CPR for media and communications claims
- JCPC allows appeal in reference innuendo case
- James Price QC retires
- Transgender man who gave birth loses anonymity
- Tommy Robinson jailed for nine months for contempt
- Divisional Court to hear Yaxley-Lennon committal application
- QC succeeds at trial of preliminary issue
- Euromillions winner succeeds in privacy claim
- Court of Appeal to hear ZXC v Bloomberg LP privacy case
- Serafin v Malkiewicz: Order of Court of Appeal
- 5RB at the London Legal Walk 2019
- JCPC to hear libel reference appeal
- Supreme Court hands down judgment in Lachaux
- ASA granted urgent injunction
- Department for Education defeat defamation claim
- Meaning decision in claim over Police news article
- Government press release was a statement of opinion
- Seven new members join 5RB
- Serafin wins libel appeal
- Meaning ruling in Grenfell libel claim
- Apple ordered to provide access to family photos
- Ex-police commander wins apology and compensation
- Parties named in abduction ruling
- 5RB Annual Quiz 2019
- Petro Poroshenko receives apology and damages from BBC
- 5RB welcomes new members
- Three 5RB members formally take silk
- Court of Appeal win for hacking claimants
- Dan Poulter MP receives apology and damages
- Martin Lewis v Facebook libel claim concludes
- Privy Council Give Judgment in Defamation Case
- Three members of 5RB appointed as QCs
- Zahir Monir wins libel trial over UKIP Bristol Tweet
- Patrick McCafferty given silk in Australia
- Lachaux Supreme Court hearing
- Privy Council hears appeal in Nugent v Willers
- Prince Moulay Hicham receives apology and substantial damages
- 5RB top in Chambers & Partners rankings
- 5RB the ‘pre-eminent media set’ in Legal 500
- Chambers Bar Awards 2018
- ABC v Telegraph – CA grants injunction
- Court of Appeal Upholds Morrisons Data Breach Claim
- Joint statement in Brown v Bower
- Ben Hamer joins 5RB
- Information Commissioner apologises
- Conference5RB 2018
- Record libel award in Australia
- Chambers Bar Awards 2018
- Serious harm test not met by aggregation
- Economist’s privacy claim struck out
- Roberto Carlos settles “banned performance enhancing drugs” libel case
- Sir Cliff Richard wins privacy claim against BBC
- Mian Mansha settles ARY libel claim
- Mail apologises to Earl Spencer
- 5RB invites applications to join Chambers
- Foster carer settles anonymous letter claim
- Statement in Open Court in Sasha Wass QC libel claim
- Supreme Court win for ISPs in web-blocking costs case
- Person Unknown cases
- Alex Reid wins privacy injunction
- Lachaux settles HuffPost claim
- 5RB acts in “unparalleled” Australian libel case
- Evidence concludes in Cliff Richard trial
- 5RB Podcasts on Interim Injunctions
- New ICO speaker at Conference5RB
- Monir v Wood trial begins
- Trial establishes English “right to be forgotten”
- Sir Cliff Richard v BBC trial to begin
- Permission to Appeal granted in “Can’t Pay? We’ll Take it Away!” case
- Supreme Court grants PTA in Lachaux
- First “right to be forgotten” case reaches trial
- Supreme Court refuses permission in anonymity case
- ‘Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away!’ Claimants win £20,000
- 5RB ‘stands above the competition’
- Chrissy Chambers wins ‘revenge porn’ settlement
- New defamation textbook publications
- Katie Hopkins refused permission to appeal
- Scottish Law Commission proposes defamation reforms
- Statement in Open Court in Suresh v Samad and others
- Landmark judgment in group litigation data leak claim
- Singer loses interim injunction application against The Sun on Sunday
- Singer loses interim injunction against the NGN
- Rape arrest injunction lifted
- “The pre-eminent set”: Chambers UK
- 5RB Defamation Set of the Year
- 5RB Podcast on the Lachaux decision
- 5RB ‘dominates the field’ in Legal 500
- Irish High Court refers Standard Contractual Clauses to CJEU
- Express Newspapers ordered to publish agreed apology
- High Court strikes out claim against Channel 5
- Trial in Morrisons data leak case begins
- 5RB Arrivals and Departures
- Middle Temple Visit to Washington DC
- Matthew Nicklin QC appointed to High Court
- ‘Serious harm’ appeals dismissed
- 5RB welcomes back Victoria Simon-Shore
- Supreme Court refuses permission in DPA/libel claim
- Journalists seeking comment held not harassment
- Supreme Court dismisses anonymity Appeal
- Perjury defendant loses anonymity
- Segregated Muslim School Named after Press Challenge
- Consultant wins Dental CPD dispute
- Media and Communications List Report
- No preliminary issue on serious harm
- Hiranandani-Vandrevala makes statement in open court
- Court of Appeal rejects anonymity challenge
- Sir Cliff obtains order requiring BBC to say if source was Yewtree
- 5RB at the London Legal Walk 2017
- “Can’t Pay? We’ll Take it Away!” summary judgment application dismissed
- Sex Offender Fails in Defamation Claim
- Timeshare Company wins Libel Damages
- Media and Communications List Consultation
- Call for Views on GDPR derogations closes
- Nadhim Zahawi awarded £200,000 libel damages
- 5RB Quiz 2017
- Founder of the Islam Channel awarded £140,000 in libel damages
- Supreme Court unanimously dismisses appeals by media defendants
- Jack Monroe wins libel claim against Katie Hopkins
- Mr Justice Warby to head new list for media-related cases
- Council apologises for false abuse letter
- Truth defence ruled out in charity case
- Prince wins libel and DPA appeals
- FlyMeNow awarded ‘minimal’ damages
- First order made under s.12 of the Defamation Act 2013
- Supreme Court refuses Simpson permission to appeal
- Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman awarded £185k libel damages
- Lachaux appeal hearing begins
- 29 phone hacking claims settle
- Neighbours’ dispute leads to £32,080 award of damages
- Vegetarian restaurateur awarded £9000 libel damages for cow death allegation
- High Court grants interim injunction
- Rahman libel trial commences
- Malicious Prosecution claim succeeds
- Libel success for President of Sikh Gurdwara
- Conference 5RB 2016
- Judge grants Middleton injunction
- 5RB Welcomes Tom Blackburn SC (Australia)
- Court of Appeal overturns Simpson strike out
- Cheshire West Contemnor Jailed
- Wafic Saïd settles Data Protection Act claim against Barclays
- UPDATED – Conference5RB 2016 Programme
- 5RB at the London Legal Walk 2016
- Supreme Court upholds PJS injunction
- Journalist succeeds in overturning police warning
- Privacy: Statements in open court
- Sun phone-hacking claims to proceed
- New decision on serious harm
- Murderer named on media application
- 10th Annual 5RB Quiz
- Ministry of Defence succeed in defence of privacy claim
- Teenagers guilty of Angela Wrightson murder cannot be named
- 5RB at the Big Voice London Moots
- 5RB welcomes back Victoria Simon-Shore
- Supreme Court refuses permission in two media cases
- New Senior Clerk: Andrew Love
- Jimmy White Libel Claim Settles
- The Law of Privacy & the Media Launch
- Farewell to Kim
- Pre-action disclosure in Heir Hunters dispute
- Paul Burrell wins privacy claim
- Harassment Warning Challenge to Proceed
- Conde Nast fined for contempt
- City libel claim struck out
- Intrusion into Physical Privacy
- Harassment by Publication
- New edition of The Law of Privacy and the Media published
- New Supplement to Gatley published
- Claimant succeeds in latest serious harm trial
- Cheshire West defendant guilty of contempt
- Mirror phone-hacking damages appeal dismissed
- Niall Horan wins round in libel claim
- Mail on Sunday in Bannatyne win
- Revised Editor’s Code of Practice
- Sunday Times wins libel claim
- Wellers win MailOnline photos appeal
- Author’s cyberstalker imprisoned
- Condé Nast found in contempt of court
- Summary Judgment in Cheshire West case
- University of Sussex apologises to ex-student
- 5RB tops Chambers & Partners 2016
- Crime and Courts Act: damages provisions in force
- Court of Appeal hearing in ANL v Weller
- New Senior Clerk
- Anna Coppola speaks at Malaysian media law conference
- Privy Council allows Reynolds appeal
- 5RB welcomes Jake Rudman
- 15 year old convicted of terror offence cannot be named
- 5RB welcomes John Stables
- Chambers UK Bar Awards 2015
- New decision on serious harm
- 5RB tops Legal 500
- Permission to appeal in MGN phone hacking case
- Sportsman granted interim injunction
- Parliamentary Election Petition dismissed
- Lachaux: Judgment on serious harm
- IPSO requires front page references to corrections
- Supreme Court to hear Vidal-Hall
- B&B Owner refused injunction
- Permission granted to add data protection claim
- MPs may no longer waive parliamentary privilege
- Judgment handed down in Coventry v Lawrence
- NFU succeed in Court of Appeal
- Max Clifford privacy strike out application refused
- Picardo awarded £30,000 in damages
- Service of injunction via Instagram
- IPSO consults on arbitration scheme
- Judgment in MGN phone-hacking case
- 5RB at the London Legal Walk
- Harassment victim wins libel damages
- Supreme Court lifts OPO injunction
- Mail loses JK Rowling appeal
- Prince Charles letters released
- 5RB Talks: Manchester
- 5RB arrival: Greg Callus
- Mosque dispute claimants awarded £45,000 each
- 5RB Quiz 2015
- Privy Council hears libel appeal
- Former UN official obtains harassment injunction
- Prince Charles letters to be released
- Footballer refused privacy injunction
- House of Lords on Press Regulation
- Under 18s reporting restriction changes
- ‘Revenge porn’ offence commencement
- Cruddas Appeal allowed in part
- 5RB Talks 2015: Cardiff
- 5RB at the Big Voice London Moots
- Privacy injunction statistics published
- Supreme Court: police retention of data lawful
- N-word text appeal dismissed
- ‘Revenge Porn’ becomes a specific criminal offence
- 5RB Talks 2015: Bristol
- Supreme Court hears costs appeal
- ICO requires changes to Google privacy policy
- Court of Appeal upholds Rihanna passing off claim
- ICO finds in favour of campaigning charity
- OPO v MLA to begin in Supreme Court
- Christina Michalos appointed to Gray’s Inn Bench
- CQC apologises to Jill Finney
- Times costs appeal in Flood rejected
- ‘Plebgate’ Judgment
- Desmond Browne QC named silk of the year
- Man held in contempt by Gibraltar court
- Apology and damages in “serious financial loss” claim
- Adam Speker at #AvoidtheScandal
- “Plebgate” trial begins
- Nuisance calls and texts consultation
- Miller and Crawford: permission refused
- 21st Edition of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts out now
- Press Recognition Panel established
- 5RB tops Chambers & Partners 2015
- Limitation appeal allowed
- Frank Warren wins libel damages
- Third Time Unlucky
- Section 1 appeal will not go ahead
- Couderc v France referred to Grand Chamber
- Legal 500 Awards 2014
- Doctor wins libel claim against the Daily Mail
- Chambers Bar Awards 2014
- Slander Action Settles
- Lord Neuberger gives Conference5RB speech
- Permission to appeal on Defamation Act 2013
- IPSO launches
- FT appoints independent Complaints Commissioner
- ICO publishes data protection guide for the media
- Privacy Cases Double Over Four Years
- Defamation Act 2013 – First Cases
- Conference5RB 2014 update
- Chambers Bar Awards 2014
- Mosque libel trial adjourned part-heard
- Lords: Current laws sufficient for social media offences
- Witness Immunity Rule Extends to Harassment
- Garcia v ANL trial begins in the High Court
- 5RB Arrival
- Lords inquiry into social media offences
- Attorney General to withdraw contempt archives plans
- Police Sergeant awarded £60,000 libel damages
- What does “damage” mean under the DPA?
- “Core” of major terrorism trial to be held in private
- Matthew Nicklin QC becomes Joint Head of Chambers
- Mark Warby QC sworn in as a High Court Judge
- Changes to copyright law come into force
- Counsellor receives apology
- 5RB Quiz 2014
- 5RB at the London Legal Walk
- Line-dancing teacher receives apology from rival over libellous claims
- Mark Warby QC speaks at the Asian Racing Conference
- CJEU: Google must remove certain search results
- AVB granted privacy injunction
- Senior Property Executive Settles Privacy Claim
- Russell Brand accepts libel damages and apology
- Changes to copyright law to come into force 1 June 2014
- 5RB London Legal Walk Team 2014
- Paul Weller succeeds in High Court privacy claim
- CJEU declares Data Retention Directive invalid
- High Court hears Weller privacy trial
- Lord Neuberger to address Conference5RB
- Supreme Court: FOIA not only means of disclosure
- Law Commission recommends online reporting restriction database
- MOJ releases latest statistics on privacy injunctions
- Supreme Court rules on production order evidence
- Attorney General’s Panel Appointment
- Paul Gascoigne settles privacy claim
- Media law cases before the ECtHR
- ICO consults on guidance for the media
- Judge awards Claimants £45,000 each
- 5RB is looking to expand
- New edition of Gatley on Libel and Slander out now
- New time limit for defamation jury trial applications
- Law Commission recommends contempt exemption for online archives
- AGO to publish advisory notes online
- High Court hearing in construction industry “blacklisting” claims
- Court of Appeal dismisses costs appeal in Mitchell “Plebgate” libel case
- Mark Warby QC named in Who’s Who Legal
- Defamation Act 2013 to come into force on 1 January 2014
- Costs in defamation and privacy proceedings
- Defamation Act 2013 talks
- Matthew Nicklin QC to speak at corporate forum
- ECHR: Liability of Website Operators for User Comments not a breach
- New Criminal Practice Directions
- 5RB is looking to expand
- 5RB welcomes Gervase de Wilde
- Dame Victoria Sharp sworn in as a Lady Justice of Appeal
- Social media marketing: new legal guide
- Blackstone’s Guide to the Defamation Act 2013 published
- MoJ Consultation on s.5 Operators of Websites Regulations Guidance
- Lance Armstrong settles Sunday Times case over defamation damages
- NFU win injunction against Badger Cull Protesters
- Mark Warby QC to speak at JUSTICE Conference
- Rihanna wins passing off claim against Topshop
- Former Tory Treasurer awarded £180,000 against Sunday Times
- Iain Christie appointed Secretary to the Civil Mediation Council
- Surfer wins damages
- DPP unveils guidance on social media prosecutions
- 5RB at Leeds medical law conference
- Defamation Act receives Royal Assent
- CJC report on defamation costs published
- 5RB silks at 2013 Oxford International Media Moot
- Justin Rushbrooke and Matthew Nicklin take silk
- Reforming Civil Litigation – A report
- Croatian Actor wins damages for “Nazi war criminal” error
- Blogger loses libel claim against Council
- PCC: no need for prominence in libel reports
- Suspended prison sentence for Madeleine McCann contempt
- Local council and newspaper pay substantial damages
- Google can be liable as publisher
- Banker libel case settles
- Peter Cruddas awarded £45k for breach of election law libel
- Naomi Campbell wins elephant cruelty libel claim
- Businessman awarded £7,500 for twitter campaign
- New contractual terms
- 5RB Barrister in The Lawyer’s Hot 100
- Christina Michalos to address symposium
- Reform of copyright exceptions
- Community orders for data protection breaches?
- 5RB.com 1000th case report
- Anna Coppola joins Singapore law firm
- Court of Appeal rules on Jameel abuse
- Was prank call a crime?
- Amendments to harassment legislation
- Leveson Report published
- Law Commission launches consultation on Contempt of Court
- Ashcroft cleared of corruption links
- ‘Powerhouse’ 5RB praised for strength in depth
- 5RB Sponsors National Pro Bono Centre
- David Sherborne Defamation/Privacy Junior of the Year
- Judgment day in Joseph v Spiller
- Jury awards libel damages to Frankie Boyle
- Defamation Bill Second Reading in the House of Lords
- Mail on Sunday report privilege fails
- ASA reviewer to pay judicial review costs
- Libel dispute settled by arbitration
- Just weeks away…
- Opening Ceremony Competition
- Tulisa’s ex admits uploading sex film
- 5RB: arrivals and departure
- First jury libel trial for 3 years
- Solicitor settles phone hacking libel claim
- 5RB practice management changes
- Solicitor wins poster libel case
- Disclosure order against internet trolling
- Leveson Inquiry
- Defamation Bill published
- OFCOM recommends press self-regulation
- Times withdraws Flood appeal
- Guardian overturns disclosure ruling
- Tulisa obtains injunction
- Report recommends current approach to privacy law
- 5RB silks judge Oxford media moot
- Flood: Supreme Court overturns Court of Appeal
- Mail on Sunday apologises to MP
- Press Complaints Commission to go
- Government Response on the Draft Defamation Bill
- Nanny and cleaner book on Jaqueline Gold restrained
- Great Ticket Scandal injunction fails
- 5RB FRU and Bar Pro Bono Quiz 2012
- Telegraph refused permission to appeal in Thornton case
- Times contempt challenge ruled inadmissible
- Media victorious in Strasbourg
- Jackson civil costs reforms delayed
- 5RB Barrister in The Lawyer’s Hot 100
- Leveson challenge dismissed
- 5RB’s secret history unearthed
- 5RB barristers join Sport Resolutions panels
- Mulcaire wins NGN indemnity claim
- Nancy no gold-digger says Judge, dismissing Dell’Olio claim
- Eleven banned in racing corruption enquiry
- Summary judgment for ex-MP
- Leveson Victims’ submissions
- Leveson Inquiry Starts
- 5RB tops Chambers and Partners 2012
- Radio Four’s Unreliable Evidence on trial by media
- Liability for hyperlinks
- Sunday Times settles Baturina libel claim
- Bill Joint Committee urges bolder reform
- Supreme Court hears Times’ Flood Appeal
- Report on Draft Defamation Bill
- Desmond Browne QC addresses the Leveson Inquiry
- 5RB Announces new Joint Head of Chambers
- Leveson Inquiry: 2nd Teaching Session held
- Landmark media win in footballer privacy trial
- ‘Truly experts’
- Mosley refused ECHR Grand Chamber
- Changes to Defamation Costs Management Scheme
- Iain Christie returns to practice
- Saudi businessman awarded £175,000 libel damages
- Family Courts: Media Access & Reporting
- Thornton wins historic libel and malicious falsehood trial
- Privacy law: the tweet
- Key Rio Ferdinand privacy decision expected October
- Rio Ferdinand privacy trial begins
- Defamation Bill Committee update
- Privacy law in 10 minutes: the blog
- Launch of Early Resolution CIC
- Sir Charles Gray to Adjudicate Phone Hacking
- BBC finds sweatshop film ‘probably’ faked
- First social media contempt case
- The Sun apologises to ‘Baby P’ social worker
- Ramsay father-in-law fails in Court of Appeal
- Phone hacking test cases chosen
- Committee reports on super-injunctions
- ECHR rejects Mosley privacy application
- Leading Arabic newspaper wins libel damages
- Council refused Supreme Court permission
- Phone hacking ‘test’ cases to be tried
- Nigel Abbas joins 5RB
- Joint Defamation Bill Committee appointed
- BBC air series on media law
- Met Police fail to stop phone hacking libel claim
- Court of Appeal upholds strict liability for innuendo meanings
- New edition of privacy book published
- Draft Defamation Bill unveiled
- Appeal judge receives libel apology
- Sikh leader’s appeal dismissed
- Sikh sect leader ordered to pay £250,000 security
- ‘JIH’ wins privacy appeal
- MGN wins Campbell success fee ruling
- Interpreter awarded £30,000 for libel
- Public authority loses privilege appeal
- Procedure Group calls for defamation reform
- Former MP loses ‘expenses’ libel claim
- Flood v Times may go to Supreme Court
- Supreme Court liberalises fair comment
- New Supplement to Gatley published
- Solicitor wins phone hacking libel claim
- Melanie Phillips apologises for libel
- ICO imposes first DPA breach fines
- Sun apologises for body scanner libel
- Ronaldo wins libel damages
- 5RB tops directory ranking
- New edition of Borrie & Lowe
- Baby P social worker receives apologies
- Binyam Mohamed injunction refused
- Company awarded internet libel damages
- California introduces ‘anti-paparazzi’ law
- 5RB success at the Bar Awards 2010
- Stig injunction refused
- Spectator apologises for IslamExpo libel
- New proposal for anonymity appeals
- Pitt & Jolie win ‘false privacy’ case
- Amazon reviews case settles
- Flood wins Reynolds appeal
- Second reading for Defamation Bill
- Fiddes v Channel 4 libel claim settles
- Fiddes trial to go ahead without jury
- PCC Review reveals seven-fold increase in complaints
- Barry George wins libel damages
- Doctor accepts substantial libel damages
- Les Mis star wins libel compensation
- Mosque Trust granted permission to appeal
- Libel law discussion on Radio 4
- Ummah Welfare Trust trustees receive apology over false terrorist link allegations
- Durand School receives libel apology
- BCA discontinue Singh claim
- Simon Singh wins appeal
- ‘Bunker billionairess’ claim survives strike out bid
- Expenses MP in libel setback
- Libel Working Group report published
- Government responds to internet consultation
- Asbestos slander claim struck out
- Jockey fails in BHA claim
- Lawyers challenge CFA proposals
- Eady J addresses new Centre
- Berezovsky wins libel action
- CFA success fees to be restricted
- Select Committee report published
- Independent retracts Trafigura allegations
- Google executives convicted
- PCC rejects Gately complaints
- Supreme Court to hear fair comment appeal
- Lord Hoffmann delivers speech on ‘libel tourism’
- 5RB Charity Quiz 2010
- EU Parliament hears evidence on UK defamation law
- Response to libel reform proposals
- Libel law reform panel announced
- Media law debated at Cambridge Union
- CFA Consultation Paper launched
- Jackson costs report published
- Peaches accepts libel damages
- Criminal libel abolished
- Canada adopts Reynolds defence
- Desmond Browne returns to 5RB
- BBC apologises to Trafigura
- Barry George wins apology
- New Ofcom Broadcasting Code
- Interbrew rulings breached Article 10
- Eady J gives keynote speech
- Convicted murderer’s libel action fails
- Defamation actions on the increase
- Peacock settles libel action
- Wikipedia sued by convicted killers
- 5RB tops Chambers & Partners review
- PCC publishes phone tapping report
- Ofcom dismisses arrest privacy complaint
- Ronaldo accepts libel damages
- Richard Parkes QC joins the bench
- Cole settles privacy claim
- Kate Winslet wins libel apology ruling
- 5RB member runs New York marathon
- 5RB welcomes new tenant
- Science writer gets leave to appeal
- Wine connoisseur toasts victory
- New guidelines on reporting restrictions published
- Browne warns of the ‘database state’
- Accountant wins £30,000 damages for libel and harassment
- Non-parties made to bear costs
- Changes to PCC Editors’ Code
- Chambers Bar Awards 2009
- 5RB welcomes back Anna Coppola
- Legal 500 2009 review praises 5RB
- 5RB’s juniors: the Legal 500 verdict
- Review of internet libel law launched
- New libel costs scheme introduced
- Police clarify photography laws
- Science writer appeal setback
- Jacob Zuma wins libel damages
- Frank Warren wins libel damages
- Increase in number of libel claims
- Tom Bower wins Desmond libel case
- 5RB QC named in Top 100 Lawyers
- Horseracing inquiry ends with admissions
- Google held not to be a publisher
- BHA declare Hayley Turner fit to ride
- News Of The World in phone tap claims
- Richard Desmond libel trial stopped
- Victory for woman labelled ‘violent’
- The Times free to identify blog author
- IVF doctor libel case settles
- Select Committee hears final evidence
- EMLRs move to 5RB
- Abortion Statistics Tribunal Begins
- 5th London Legal Sponsored Walk
- Jack Straw critical of high costs
- Alfie’s not the dad: injunction lifted
- Injunction application hit for six
- Times convicted of contempt of court
- Review of Civil Costs published
- TV lie detector tester wins apology
- Editors warn MPs of threats to press
- Journalists give evidence to MPs
- EC challenge over internet privacy
- New rules for family courts access
- George wins 75K libel damages
- Elton John refused leave to appeal
- PCC Chair gives evidence to MPs
- Eastenders actor’s libel trial begins
- Liverpool libel trial collapses
- Guardian fails to overturn injunction
- Strasbourg rejects single publication
- Mosley and McCann give evidence to Select Committee
- New proposals on defamation costs
- PCC Chairman responds to critics
- CFAs ‘incompatible’ with ECHR: Report
- PCC probes ‘baby-faced father’ story
- Self-regulation ‘failing the public’
- Lords voice privacy concerns
- 5RB Charity Quiz 2009
- Claimant wins abortion libel case
- Select committee to review privacy law
- Express pays £35k to a property advisor for Mafia slurs
- Self regulation is no ‘fig leaf’: Meyer
- £50,000 for dentist accused of car finance fraud
- Desmond Browne QC on Radio 4
- PCC rejects Roy Meadows complaint
- Murderer wins photos injunction
- ‘Magic Alex’ libel claims reinstated
- New consultation on defamation law
- Media to gain greater access to family courts
- New High Court Judges appointed
- Apology over ‘misery memoir’
- Australian court rules on sex tape privacy claim
- DNA retention infringes Article 8
- Cab rank rule ‘fundamental’ to independent Bar
- Mother loses ‘Ugly’ libel trial
- Fallon and BHA settle their differences
- Accountant wins ‘IVA Council’ claim
- New edition of Gatley out soon
- Parliament to review media law
- Tory Peer to head PCC
- 5RB tops Legal 500
- QCs defend judge in privacy row
- Chambers: 5RB is the ‘gold standard’
- Mail chief slams privacy rulings
- Victoria Beckham fails in privacy bid
- Speedy trial for Sienna Miller
- Canadian Court: hyperlinking to a libel is not publishing it
- Mark Warby QC to address Data Protection and Privacy Conference
- PCC reiterates privacy guidance
- Lords refuse leave in Murray
- Judge lifts adoption injunction
- Anna Coppola to take maternity leave
- ‘Tapas Seven’ win libel damages
- Smaller proportion of defamation actions reaching trial
- High speed trial for former rail union chief
- BBC ordered to bear costs after withdrawing privilege defence
- Sienna Miller wins photo damages
- 5RB wins Chambers and Partners award
- 5RB hold second conference
- Sheffield Wednesday FC drop libel claims against fans
- Tesco accepts Guardian apology
- Yuli Takatsuki to join 5RB as new tenant from 1 October 2008
- Publisher settles Warren libel action
- Sir Salman Rushdie slurs declared false
- United Nations attacks UK libel law
- CONFERENCE 5RB 24 September 2008
- Apology for Prince Philip cancer story
- Palace to make privacy complaint
- George Galloway wins libel damages
- 400k fine for BBC phone-in fakery
- Max Mosley awarded £60,000
- Irish privacy claimant wins €90k
- Media gain access to care case
- Warren wins offer of amends appeal
- Max Mosley privacy trial concludes
- Scottish solicitor cleared of contempt
- UK phone tap laws violated Article 8
- Police raid privacy complaint upheld
- Mosley damages claim survives
- US court rejects ‘character’ privacy
- PCC reject Rowling home address complaint
- Ofcom imposes record radio fine
- Ofcom dismisses binge drinking privacy complaint
- New review of CFAs announced
- Hanratty denied permission to appeal
- Ronaldo wins ‘text message’ damages
- London Paper apologises to Mayor
- Author wins book order reprieve
- ECJ: 3’s use of O2 trade mark lawful
- MEP wins ‘gravy train’ libel damages
- Job seeker wins Express apology
- Duo lose Busted royalties claim
- Ozzy Osbourne accepts damages for Brit Awards slur
- Rooney book libel case settles
- New Anti-Doping Advisor qualifies
- Newspapers fined by French court
- Boris Johnson lodges privacy complaint
- Ofcom clears C4’s BB of unfairness
- Magazine in trouble over payment offer
- Online and privacy complaints to PCC on the rise
- Kiss ‘n’ tell and snatched photos
- Italian magazine wins in High Court
- Survey reveals bloggers unaware of libel risks
- Hurley and Grant win privacy claim
- C4 Dispatches wins ‘fakery’ damages
- ITV pays £5.6 million price for phone in scandal
- Pushchair privacy appeal succeeds
- PCC rules on roadside privacy and court reporting
- Conference5RB 2008 Launched
- Air India chief wins libel trial
- Football manager wins libel damages
- OFT pays out over milk pricing investigation
- Charity regulator reports privileged
- Air India executive libel trial begins
- BBC wins Doctor Who copyright case
- Website fined for linking to privacy-invading content
- GMTV star wins libel damages
- Mosley refused ‘orgy’ injunction
- Journalist wins access to injunction application skeleton arguments
- Actor wins ‘dog theft’ libel apology
- Singer wins ‘Whiter Shade’ appeal
- Largest damages yet for internet libel
- Heinz wins ‘swastika pasta’ apology
- Retreat on new press data law
- Police win access to book research
- Matthew Nicklin on BBC Radio 4’s Law in Action
- Judge: no secrecy for royal blackmail trial
- McCanns win front page apologies
- Adelson accepts apology, damages
- Northern Ireland newspaper wins restaurant review appeal
- Bid to injunct Channel 4 fails
- Pushchair privacy case goes to appeal
- PCC considers ‘intrusion’ of Facebook users’ privacy
- Lords refuse Springer petition
- Romanian royal faces Reynolds appeal
- Hung jury in abortion libel trial
- Internet archives ‘create contempt risk’
- Sheridan witnesses charged with perjury
- Computer printers may breach privacy laws
- Pharmacist loses slander action
- Witness granted anonymity in libel trial
- Danish newspaper apologises to bank
- BNP members refused permission to appeal in reportage case
- Big Brother’s Lisa loses libel appeal
- 5RB Charity Quiz 2008
- Stephen Bate joins CEDR panel
- Double attack on Ryanair advertising
- PCC rejects childbirth privacy complaint
- New York to fight ‘libel tourism’
- Sienna Miller wins privacy action
- Press regulator reports record number of complaints
- Media challenge secrecy in murder trial
- Government proposes changes to copyright exceptions
- PCC upholds privacy complaint against OK!
- OK! sues Heat over celebrity pregnancy story
- Doctor settles lengthy libel action
- Channel Four fined £1.5m
- MOD obtains gagging order
- Kidman wins libel damages
- Privacy payout for Sienna Miller
- Patrick Moloney QC becomes a judge
- Jerry Springer: not blasphemous libel
- Australian court makes $1.6m libel damages award
- Panorama rapped over wi-fi report
- Source protection boost from ECHR
- Launch of The Trials of Art
- Appointment to the Bar Standards Board
- Gatley Supplement now on sale
- Blairs win privacy payout
- Newspaper fined for naming child
- Leading vet in Privy Council victory
- Jerry Springer – The Opera back in Court
- Channel 4 cleared in TV ‘fakery’ row
- Northern Rock granted injunction against Financial Times
- Wikipedia not liable for content
- IVF doctor settles HFEA libel claim
- 5RB tops Chambers & Partners review
- £165,000 libel damages for terrorism claim
- Big Brother cleared over language
- Police ordered to delete criminal records
- Diana Coroner granted C4 order
- FA saves ‘World Cup Willie’
- Anonymity order challenged
- Author succeeds on Reynolds Appeal
- Vice Chairman of Bar announced
- Chambers Bar Awards 2007
- Ofcom hits GMTV with record fine
- 5RB tops Legal 500
- MLRC returns to London
- Paul McKenna suffers costs loss
- Regulators hand out more TV fines
- FT names 5RB ‘media innovators’
- Damages for trio cleared of murder
- Ofcom fines Five £300,000
- ‘Abuse’ couple win fight to keep their baby
- J. K. Rowling’s son in privacy fight
- Sunday Times source convicted
- MP wins ‘swearing’ libel claim
- Hollingsworth bid for extra £25k fails
- Businessman awarded £85k damages
- Reform of contempt laws considered
- Hollingsworth jury awards £75,000
- Channel 4 rapped by Ofcom
- PCC rejects privacy complaints
- Call to extend performers’ rights
- PCC raps Sun over pregnancy story
- Hedge dispute clarifies privilege
- OK! wins Douglas appeal
- Slave libel claim dismissed
- BBC wins FOI appeal
- Record PCC privacy complaints
- Racing bans after corruption inquiry
- 75k jury award upheld on appeal
- ITN sued over prison key footage
- Landmark privacy case in Australia
- McKennitt challenge rejected
- WPP libel and privacy case settles
- Da Vinci Code judgment upheld
- Formula One libel actions conclude
- WPP libel and privacy trial begins
- £10,000 damages for cricketer
- Jockeys banned after corruption inquiry
- Strasbourg protects right to satirise
- Beckham kidnap plot: NoW ‘sorry’
- ‘Rooney prostitute’ libel claim struck out
- Royal phone hacker jailed for 4 months
- 5RB Charity Quiz 2007
- McKennitt v Ash to the Lords?
- £40,000 damages awarded in ‘sex act’ trial
- Prince of Wales judgment upheld
- Organist wins authorship claim
- Newspaper snooping chart revealed
- New blow for kiss and tell?
- Gowers publishes Review of IP system
- No retrospective public access to court documents
- Privacy case in the Court of Appeal
- Blogs win US libel immunity
- OK! v Hello! reaches the Lords
- Covert surveillance did not breach RIPA
- Judge lifts family reporting ban
- New challenges to freedom of speech
- 5RB tops Chambers & Partners review
- Ofcom dismisses school privacy complaint
- Wall St Journal wins Reynolds case
- Irish Times editor faces prison sentence
- Court papers access challenge
- New faces at 5RB
- Online music providers agree deal on royalties
- 5RB tops Legal 500 survey
- Victory in Europe for Wainwrights
- ‘Smacking children’ injunction bid fails
- PCC rejects UKIP subterfuge complaint
- PCC privacy ruling on pregnancy
- PCC upholds source confidentiality complaint
- Tommy Sheridan awarded £200,000
- Paul McKenna wins ‘bogus’ PhD case
- End of the line for Fallon
- Political advertising ban challenged
- Jail sentences for misuse of data?
- Fallon racing ban upheld
- Armstrong settles Times libel case
- Father wins family report ban case
- Jameel reaches the Lords
- Sir Elton fails in injunction bid
- Dentist loses libel & harassment case
- Armstrong wins latest Times battle
- R1 rapped again over bad language
- Former driving examiner wins £30,000
- Watchdog orders ID card report release
- Adidas can use logo at Wimbledon
- ECJ rules on airline data case
- Boris Berezovsky wins £50,000
- £100,000 damages for Sir Elton John
- FIFA climbdown on doping regulations
- Judge calls for libel and privacy reform
- BNP candidates lose libel claim
- Afghan Hijackers name ban lifted
- Call for jail terms for data thieves
- Trainer’s bid to overturn race result fails
- Beatles iTunes challenge fails
- Ex-Formula 1 boss awarded £75,000
- The Lawyer apologises for judgment leak
- Da Vinci judge creates own code
- Trainer’s appeal fails
- News Group pays £100k to Rooney
- Da Vinci Code win for Dan Brown
- ‘Fake Sheikh’ faces exposure by MP
- Aussie Rules anti-doping results remain private
- Prince fails to stop journals’ trial
- Wailers royalties battle begins
- 5RB bids farewell to member
- Practical immunity for ISPs confirmed
- BBC wins waiting lists libel claim
- Beckhams’ libel claim discontinued
- Select Committee reports on CFAs
- Family law media reporting challenge
- Prince of Wales judgment awaited
- Court of Appeal hears Turner appeal
- Prince of Wales case in Court again
- Times in French libel battle
- Journalist wins Brady source case
- Further cocaine allegation allowed in Moss libel case
- Wainwright declared admissible
- BNP Candidate refused permission to appeal
- Performers gain moral rights
- Privacy supplement out now
- Ashley Cole appeal fails
- Telegraph loses Galloway appeal
- Proposals to strengthen IP Protection
- PCC rejects Edmonds’ privacy complaint
- Source protection trial commences
- Inverdale stamping not deliberate
- Rowling Privacy Complaint upheld
- Musician Wins Privacy Claim
- Trainer fined for destroying horse
- Trainer found guilty in corruption case
- Artists to benefit from new resale right
- Social workers fail in bid for anonymity
- New Review of IP Announced
- Law for Journalists Conference 2005
- BBC loses Qualified Privilege Defence
- Data Protection appeal refused leave
- New media law titles available
- Media warned over bombing claims
- 5RB hosts Trade Mark Seminar
- Sports Law Conference: 30 Nov 2005
- BNP Candidate Loses Libel Action
- Solicitor wins libel and harassment case
- Challenge to ban on political advertising
- £250,000 damages for Rupert Lowe
- Chambers’ Review: 5RB top again
- Naomi Campbell costs ruling
- Jockey Club sees off challenge
- Galloway case returns to Court
- ‘Ferguson’ denied trade mark protection
- Five year ban for jockey
- Media challenge CPR change
- The new term ahead…
- New faces at 5RB
- ‘Chambers of the Year’ goes to 5RB
- 5RB tops annual Legal 500 Review
- Canadian Net libel case rejected
- 5RB nominated for three top awards
- London hosts MLRC Conference
- 5RB at Media Law Conference
- Fall in defamation court cases
- Tapping up’ case goes to Lausanne
- Ofcom raps BBC for daytime vice
- Concern for London bomb suspects’ right to a fair trial
- Criminal trials may be televised
- New regulatory code for broadcasters
- Polanski awarded £50,000 damages
- Media must be told of injunction applications
- Appeal allowed in database case
- Health Care Trust wins High Court Libel Trial
- Bid to stop under-cover footage fails
- PCC claims to resolve record number of complaints
- Journalist jailed for refusing to reveal source
- Televising the Courts: results of consultation
- Software firms face file-sharing liability
- Trial date set in Barclays v Times
- High Court Judge quits the bench
- 5RB welcomes new member
- Royal Television Society Discussion Evening
- PETA resists video footage injunction
- Jerry Springer judicial review fails
- Image Rights and Privacy Talk
- Football libel trial – hung jury
- Channel 4 film given go-ahead
- Guilty verdicts in ‘tapping-up’ case
- ASA rejects KFC complaints
- Aerial libel costs £22,500
- CFAs face new challenge in Lords
- New Ofcom Broadcasting Code
- Harassment hotline launched by regulators
- Ofcom rejects BBC programme complaints
- Hello! wins ‘privacy’ appeal
- Latest libel Damages awards
- Radio 2 is Station of the Year
- Ofcom rejects Jerry Springer complaint
- Jessie Wallace fails in injunction bid
- Lords to hear Jameel Appeal
- Beckham ‘kidnap’ libel claim fails
- New Copyright Regulations
- Beckhams’ nanny gives undertakings
- Beckhams fail in Injunction Bid
- Indemnity costs in police libel case
- Galloway case off to Court of Appeal
- Ofcom upholds privacy complaint
- Court dismisses police claim for libel
- Smith & Collins Stewart win libel action
- 5RB Speaker Updates Disclosure Conference
- Ramsden fined for doping rule breaches
- 5RB in media regulation debate
- New Practice for Family Division Injunctions
- First defamation costs capping order
- Jockey banned for drugs protocol breach
- Milne liable for CFA costs
- BBC faces JR for Jerry Springer
- Jockey fined for misleading investigators
- Privacy injunction for Elizabeth Jagger
- Maxine Carr gets lifetime anonymity
- Hamilton ‘rape’ claims in new trial
- Calls for PCC to be scrapped
- McLibel pair win ECHR Appeal
- Playboy TV fined £25,000
- Polanski Appeal Allowed
- The Sun fined for contempt
- Wall Street Journal appeal dismissed
- Hamiltons settle with Max Clifford
- Increased protection for advertising slogans?
- Al Rajhi 9/11 claim dismissed
- Data protection fines for police staff
- First peer-to-peer filesharing convictions
- The new term ahead…
- Public Authorities open their records
- Reporting restrictions refused in Burrell rape trial
- Jimmy Nail loses damages appeal
- District Judge overturns reporting restriction
- Sunday Times’ QP defence struck out
- 5RB website given new recognition
- Douglas v Hello! in the CA
- Jockey Club excludes punter
- Absolute privilege refused in child case
- Police lose qualified privilege appeal
- Guardian victory on access to court documents
- Galloway awarded £150,000 damages
- Watchdog rules against ‘violent’ advert
- Jameel Appeals in the CA
- Independent Press is ‘fundamental’
- Daily Star found guilty of contempt
- Freedom of information update
- Polanski in the Lords
- 5RB @ Media Law Conference
- Reynolds under new ECHR spotlight
- Galloway libel case reaches court
- Media access to prosecution materials
- Family court judges give evidence to Parliament
- ECJ defines database right
- ‘Bonnard’ Libel Rule Reaffirmed
- 5RB top in Chambers & Partners Review
- 5RB first with ECHR Radio France ruling
- Schwarzenegger faces libel claim
- Lords uphold freedom to report
- Global acclaim for Gatley
- Collins Stewart damages claim trimmed
- Don King libel case continues
- Ofcom censures C4 over ‘Big Brother’
- New Media Costs’ Risk for Aborted Trials
- Interim Injunctions – new guidance
- The new term ahead…
- Martin O’Neill wins libel damages from the BBC
- 5RB Welcomes New Tenants & Pupils
- New Mediator Appointment
- High Court dismisses Graham Bradley’s appeal
- PCC Rejects Privacy Complaint
- No Appeal in ECHR Privacy Case
- 5RB top in Legal 500 Review
- McLibel pair in new appeal bid
- Rave Reviews for Case Report Database!
- Media lawyers urge challenge to privacy ruling
- Farewell to Morland J
- 5RB launches Law of Photography & Digital Images
- 5RB.com launches today!
- Law Commission Report on Local Authority Inquiries
- BBC criticised for chef’s outburst
- Somerfield censured for radio ad
- 5RB gives Contempt update
- Care Home Libel Case Settled
- Major Changes to Civil Appeals
- Maccaba loses ‘Indecent Proposal’ Case
- Princess Caroline in victory over paparazzi pictures
- Sebastian Coe fails in injunction bid
- Gray J Lecture on Literature and the Law
- Ken Bates wins libel claim
- Court of Appeal gives no-win no-fee guidance
- Maxine Carr Identity Injunction Upheld
- Sony Radio Awards 2004
- Attempt to Gag C4 Dispatches Fails
- Douglas v Hello!
- Royal Controversy
- Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003
- Patrick Milmo QC Steps Down
- Tugendhat QC appointed to the Bench
- Douglas v Hello!
